New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Cloud Developer (Comm-Dev-101) Exam - Topic 1 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Cloud Developer (Comm-Dev-101) exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Cloud Developer (Comm-Dev-101) Questions]

A client sells its products in North America, Europe, and Asia, and has a B2C Commerce Site for each of these markets. The client receives three area-specific snippets of analytics code by a third-party provider to insert in the sites.

How should the developer configure an instance to allow the merchant to independently insert and update these snippets?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Emerson
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards A, but I'm not fully convinced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
3 months ago
Wait, can they really update snippets independently with these options?
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
3 months ago
C sounds like the best way to keep it organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
4 months ago
I think B could complicate things unnecessarily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
4 months ago
Option A seems like a straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
4 months ago
I vaguely recall a practice question about site preferences, but I can't remember if creating a new 'HTML' attribute was the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
4 months ago
I feel like configuring a new Service Profile could be the right way to go, especially since it sounds like it would keep things organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
4 months ago
I think using ISML conditional tags could work, but it might not be the best approach for allowing easy updates by the merchant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how important it is for merchants to have control over their site configurations, but I'm not sure which option allows for independent updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rusty
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Creating a new 'HTML' attribute in the SitePreference object type seems like the most flexible and maintainable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
5 months ago
Ah, I see. This is about allowing the merchant to independently insert and update the analytics code snippets. I think option C might be the way to go, but I'll double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward configuration question. I think I'll start by considering the different options and evaluating which one best meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully read through the question again and think through the implications of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
5 months ago
Okay, let me think through this step-by-step. The question is asking which 3 statements are true, so I'll need to carefully evaluate each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
10 months ago
Option E: Use a magic 8-ball to determine the optimal placement of the snippets. It's foolproof, I tell you!
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
10 months ago
I'm going with Option A. It's the most straightforward solution, and I'm not trying to reinvent the wheel here. Let's just get this done and move on to the next question!
upvoted 0 times
Dante
8 months ago
Yeah, let's go with Option A and get this task completed quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
9 months ago
I agree, Option A seems like the easiest way to go about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
9 months ago
Option A sounds good to me. Let's keep it simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlette
10 months ago
Haha, I'm sure the 'Configure a new Service Profile' option is just a trick question. Who would even think of that?
upvoted 0 times
Glenn
9 months ago
Haha, I'm sure the 'Configure a new Service Profile' option is just a trick question. Who would even think of that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
10 months ago
B) Use ISML conditional tags to add the snippet into the codebase.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
10 months ago
A) Create a new 'HTML' attribute in the SitePreference object type.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Staci
10 months ago
I'm not sure I agree with that. Using ISML conditional tags might be a bit more flexible and maintainable in the long run. Plus, it keeps the codebase cleaner.
upvoted 0 times
Haydee
9 months ago
Jerrod: Definitely, it's important to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
10 months ago
User 3: Creating a new 'HTML' attribute could work too, but ISML tags seem more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
10 months ago
User 2: I agree, it would make it easier for the client to update the snippets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
10 months ago
User 1: I think using ISML conditional tags is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janine
10 months ago
But wouldn't creating a new 'HTML' attribute be easier for the client to manage?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
10 months ago
Option A seems to be the obvious choice here. Creating a custom attribute in the SitePreference object type would allow the merchant to easily manage the snippets without having to touch the codebase.
upvoted 0 times
Rickie
10 months ago
Option A seems to be the best solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
10 months ago
A) Create a new 'HTML' attribute in the SitePreference object type.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pamella
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
11 months ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel