Salesforce Exam B2C Commerce Developer Topic 1 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2C Commerce Developer exam

Question #: 74
Topic #: 1

A client sells its products in North America, Europe, and Asia, and has a B2C Commerce Site for each of these markets. The client receives three area-specific snippets of analytics code by a third-party provider to insert in the sites.

How should the developer configure an instance to allow the merchant to independently insert and update these snippets?

ACreate a new 'HTML' attribute in the SitePreference object type.

BUse ISML conditional tags to add the snippet into the codebase.

CConfigure a new Service Profile with the provided snippet of code.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Kanisha at Aug 27, 2024, 08:22 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium B2C Commerce Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Adell

1 months ago

Option E: Use a magic 8-ball to determine the optimal placement of the snippets. It's foolproof, I tell you!

upvoted 0 times

...

Starr

1 months ago

I'm going with Option A. It's the most straightforward solution, and I'm not trying to reinvent the wheel here. Let's just get this done and move on to the next question!

upvoted 0 times

Jesusa

4 days ago

I agree, Option A seems like the easiest way to go about it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

16 days ago

Option A sounds good to me. Let's keep it simple and efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

2 months ago

Haha, I'm sure the 'Configure a new Service Profile' option is just a trick question. Who would even think of that?

upvoted 0 times

Glenn

21 days ago

Haha, I'm sure the 'Configure a new Service Profile' option is just a trick question. Who would even think of that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacki

1 months ago

B) Use ISML conditional tags to add the snippet into the codebase.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucy

1 months ago

A) Create a new 'HTML' attribute in the SitePreference object type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Staci

2 months ago

I'm not sure I agree with that. Using ISML conditional tags might be a bit more flexible and maintainable in the long run. Plus, it keeps the codebase cleaner.

upvoted 0 times

Haydee

13 days ago

Jerrod: Definitely, it's important to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luz

1 months ago

User 3: Creating a new 'HTML' attribute could work too, but ISML tags seem more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerrod

1 months ago

User 2: I agree, it would make it easier for the client to update the snippets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilda

2 months ago

User 1: I think using ISML conditional tags is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janine

2 months ago

But wouldn't creating a new 'HTML' attribute be easier for the client to manage?

upvoted 0 times

...

Marica

2 months ago

Option A seems to be the obvious choice here. Creating a custom attribute in the SitePreference object type would allow the merchant to easily manage the snippets without having to touch the codebase.

upvoted 0 times