New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce B2B Commerce for Administrators Accredited Professional (AP-201) Exam - Topic 4 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2B Commerce for Administrators Accredited Professional (AP-201) exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 4
[All B2B Commerce for Administrators Accredited Professional (AP-201) Questions]

A company sells various sizes of rubber O- Rings individually and in packs of 12. The company wants to present the customer with all O-Ring purchasing options within a single Product Detail Page.

Which two Salesforce B2B Commerce functionalities should the company use?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lizette
4 months ago
Aggregate Product Type is a solid choice for bundling options!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
4 months ago
Multiple Price List Items per Product could work too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
4 months ago
Wait, can you really use Attribute Driven Commerce for O-Rings? Sounds odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
4 months ago
Definitely agree with that! Makes sense for different sizes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
4 months ago
I think Pricing Tiers and Attribute Driven Commerce are the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
5 months ago
Aggregate Product Type sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it applies to our situation. I feel like we might have covered it in a different context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about pricing tiers, and it seems like that could be relevant here too, especially for the packs of 12.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
5 months ago
I think we might need to use Attribute Driven Commerce for the different sizes of O-Rings, but I'm not entirely sure about the second option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards Multiple Price List Items per Product for the individual and pack pricing, but I’m not 100% confident about that choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure the key here is that loose coupling means services should be independent and not tightly bound to each other. So creating a shared security policy seems like it might go against that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is B. The service layer is where the API-based record creation should be handled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a plan. I think the best approach is to use a combination of Cloud Build and Container Analysis to automatically scan for vulnerabilities before deploying the containers. That way, it's cloud-native and cost-efficient, with minimal operational overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel