Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce ANC-301 Exam - Topic 8 Question 38 Discussion

Posted by Marguerita on Jul 16, 2024 at 11:42 PM

A training dataset Is being prepared for a Einstein Discovery story. One skewed with outliers. at action should the Einstein consultant take?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium ANC-301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
SE
Serina 11 months ago
Changing the binning method could help too, but not always necessary.
KA
Kami 11 months ago
Nothing wrong with keeping the field if it's not the outcome variable.
TA
Tamra 12 months ago
Wait, what if the outliers are actually important?
GL
Glendora 12 months ago
Agree, outliers can skew results a lot!
MI
Mira 1 year ago
I think removing outlier rows is usually a good idea.
BR
Brandon 1 year ago
Removing the field seems drastic, especially if it has some useful information. I feel like we should explore other options first.
AD
Adelina 1 year ago
Changing the binning method could help with skewness, but I can't recall if fixed width is the right choice here.
CO
Cora 1 year ago
I think if the field isn't the outcome variable, then maybe we don't need to worry about the outliers too much? That sounds familiar.
YU
Yuki 1 year ago
I remember we discussed how outliers can skew results, but I'm not sure if removing them is always the best option.
AL
Alaine 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident the right answer is A - remove the outlier rows. Leaving in skewed data with outliers could really throw off the model, so cleaning that up first is the way to go.
LA
Lauran 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Since the question is about preparing the dataset for an Einstein Discovery story, the outliers are likely in the input data, not the target variable. In that case, I'd go with option A and remove the outlier rows.
JE
Jeffrey 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions the dataset is skewed with outliers, but it's not clear which field that applies to. I'll need to think through the implications of each answer choice.
CA
Carla 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the context. Is the skewed dataset the input data or the target variable?
CH
Christiane 1 year ago
This seems straightforward, but I want to be careful not to overlook anything. I'll methodically go through each of the listed settings and make sure they're all properly configured.
DO
Domingo 1 year ago
I studied something similar about configuring Cisco ISE, and I think option B might be relevant, but I might be mixing it up with something else.
TR
Trevor 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards A, but I want to double-check my understanding. The RADIUS server is responsible for authenticating users and devices, right? That's a key component of WPA2 Enterprise.
NA
Nan 2 years ago
Removing outliers? Pffft, that's like trying to tame a wild Einstein. I say we just let the data do its thing!
KR
Kristofer 2 years ago
↳ replying to Nan
B) Nothing, because the field is not the outcome variable.
AM
Amber 2 years ago
↳ replying to Nan
Removing outliers can help improve the accuracy of the model.
NO
Novella 2 years ago
↳ replying to Nan
A) Remove the outlier rows.
NO
Norah 2 years ago
Option D? Nah, that's just throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Let's fix the data, not discard it!
CO
Corinne 2 years ago
↳ replying to Norah
Option D? Nah, that's just throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Let's fix the data, not discard it!
ON
Ona 2 years ago
↳ replying to Norah
C) Change the method of binning to fixed width.
MA
Mary 2 years ago
↳ replying to Norah
B) Nothing, because the field is not the outcome variable.
LE
Lelia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Norah
A) Remove the outlier rows.
SH
Sherell 2 years ago
I agree with Francisca, removing the outlier rows would be the best option.
KI
King 2 years ago
I'd go with C. Changing the binning method could help handle the skewed data better.
VI
Viva 2 years ago
I'm not sure, B seems reasonable too. If the field isn't the outcome variable, why bother with the outliers?
GL
Glendora 2 years ago
↳ replying to Viva
I'm not sure, B seems reasonable too. If the field isn't the outcome variable, why bother with the outliers?
CA
Cammy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Viva
B) Nothing, because the field is not the outcome variable.
DA
Daisy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Viva
A) Remove the outlier rows.
IS
Isabelle 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe we should change the method of binning to fixed width.
AR
Arthur 2 years ago
Definitely option A. Removing outliers is crucial for a clean and reliable training dataset.
CH
Chaya 2 years ago
↳ replying to Arthur
Outliers can really skew the data, so it's best to get rid of them.
VI
Vivan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Arthur
I agree, removing outliers is important for accurate results.
FR
Francisca 2 years ago
I think we should remove the outlier rows.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel