New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce ADX-211 Exam - Topic 7 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ADX-211 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 7
[All ADX-211 Questions]

A custom object called Item has a many-to-many relationship with the Account and Quota objects. At Cloud Kicks, account owners are changed frequently while ownership of Quota records remains unchanged. When an account owner is updated, the new account owner can only see Item records if they are also the owner of the Quota record.

What step should the administrator take to give access to all Item records?

Change the data format of the Quota relationship field from master-detail to lookup.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Shawna
4 months ago
Definitely need to give access to both objects for the new owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
Wait, can you really just change it to lookup? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
4 months ago
I think a sharing rule could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
4 months ago
I disagree, that might complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
4 months ago
Changing the Quota relationship to lookup is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the master-detail vs. lookup thing. I thought master-detail was more restrictive, but I’m not sure how that affects access here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynna
5 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to adjust access based on ownership. I think giving Read access could be the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think sharing rules could be a solution here, especially since ownership changes frequently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how master-detail relationships enforce ownership, so changing it to a lookup might help with access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
5 months ago
I remember discussing strategic alliances in class, so I think that's the right answer here. But I'll double-check the definitions just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
5 months ago
I feel like Designate as the active query was mentioned in the context of LDAP authentication. Did we cover that in our last practice session?
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
9 months ago
I'm just going to go with Option D and call it a day. Who needs all this complicated relationship mumbo-jumbo anyway? Just give me the access I need and let me get on with my work!
upvoted 0 times
Dion
8 months ago
Exactly, just give me the access I need and I'll be good to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
9 months ago
Yeah, I don't have time to deal with changing data formats and criteria-based sharing rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
9 months ago
I agree, Option D seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amira
10 months ago
Option B sounds like it could work, but I'm worried it might mess up the existing relationships. Better not to mess with the master-detail unless we really have to.
upvoted 0 times
Virgie
8 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Option D is the best way to ensure the new account owner can see all Item records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
9 months ago
But option D seems like the safest choice to give access to all Item records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
9 months ago
I think option C could work without changing the data format.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aimee
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the question. Why would changing the data format of the Quota relationship field help? Seems like a weird workaround to me.
upvoted 0 times
Roxane
9 months ago
C) Create a Quota criteria-based sharing rule using ISCHANGED for the Account Owner field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
9 months ago
B) Account master-detail to secondary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
10 months ago
A) Re-assign the Quota master-detail to the primary and the
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmela
10 months ago
Option C looks interesting, but I'm not sure if a criteria-based sharing rule is the best approach. Wouldn't that require some extra maintenance down the line?
upvoted 0 times
Candida
8 months ago
D) Give the account owner Read access to both the Account and the Quota objects
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
8 months ago
Option C looks interesting, but I'm not sure if a criteria-based sharing rule is the best approach. Wouldn't that require some extra maintenance down the line?
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
8 months ago
B) Account master-detail to secondary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
8 months ago
A) Re-assign the Quota master-detail to the primary and the
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
9 months ago
I think option D might be the best choice. Giving direct access to both objects seems more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
9 months ago
C) Create a Quota criteria-based sharing rule using ISCHANGED for the Account Owner field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
9 months ago
B) Account master-detail to secondary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
10 months ago
A) Re-assign the Quota master-detail to the primary and the
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
10 months ago
Hmm, I think Option D is the way to go. Giving the account owner read access to both the Account and Quota objects seems like the most straightforward solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Krystal
9 months ago
Yeah, giving the account owner read access to both objects should ensure they can see all Item records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
9 months ago
I agree, Option D seems like the most direct approach to solve this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yvonne
10 months ago
That's a good point, James. Option D does seem like a more straightforward solution to ensure access to all Item records.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more appropriate. Giving the account owner Read access to both objects ensures access to all Item records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
11 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. It allows for sharing rules based on changes in the Account Owner field.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel