Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce ADX-211 Exam - Topic 10 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ADX-211 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 10
[All ADX-211 Questions]

AW Computing created new multi-tier service plans. The primary difference between the packages Is the length of the term. The company wants to capture start and end dates for each service plan sold, which can direr from the contract dates of the subscription.

How should an administrator ensure the data is captured properly?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Two options that the administrator should use to meet these criteria are:

Share with roles and subordinates of the finance director role. This option allows you to grant access to records based on the role hierarchy of your org. You can share records with users who are in a specific role or in roles below that role in the hierarchy. In this case, you can share records with roles and subordinates of the finance director role, which includes all the members of the finance team.

Create a criteria-based sharing rule where the won field = true. This option allows you to grant access to records based on certain field values or formulas. You can create a criteria-based sharing rule on opportunities that grants access to records where the won field is true, which means that the opportunity stage is closed won.

The other two options are incorrect because:

Make an owner-based sharing rule where the won field = true is not an option because owner-based sharing rules do not allow you to specify field values or formulas as criteria. Owner-based sharing rules only allow you to share records based on who owns them or what role or group they belong to.

Select all opportunities owned by the sales manager role is not an option because it does not meet the criteria of sharing all closed won opportunities. It only shares opportunities that are owned by users who are in the sales manager role, regardless of their stage.


by Leonida at Dec 10, 2023, 12:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ADX-211 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Anglea
4 months ago
D is definitely the way to go for product-specific rules!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reed
4 months ago
I disagree, B might be more efficient for tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
5 months ago
C seems unnecessary, just stick with A or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
5 months ago
Wait, can we really have different dates than the contract?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
5 months ago
A sounds like a solid choice for capturing those dates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards the validation rule on the Opportunity Product object. That way, we can tie the custom date fields directly to the specific service plan products, rather than just the overall opportunity. It seems like the more targeted approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
5 months ago
Okay, I've got an idea. Since the question specifically mentions capturing "start and end dates for each service plan sold," I think the validation rule on the Opportunity object is the way to go. That way, we can ensure the custom date fields are populated based on the selected products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions "multi-tier service plans" and "the length of the term" as the primary difference, so I'm wondering if creating a new price book is the right approach. Let me think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
6 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about capturing start and end dates for service plans. I think the key is to focus on the requirement to differentiate the service plan dates from the opportunity close dates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willie
6 months ago
Creating a new price book sounds like it could work, but I don't recall if it directly addresses the need for custom date fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
6 months ago
I feel like using formula fields could be useful, but I'm not entirely clear on how that would help with capturing start and end dates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
6 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to ensure data integrity for different product types. Maybe option D makes more sense since it targets the Opportunity Product specifically?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
7 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of capturing accurate dates for service plans, but I'm not sure if a validation rule on the Opportunity object is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
7 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The correct answer is Role. Roles are the key mechanism for mapping permissions to users in access control systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
7 months ago
Ah, I see now. First, disable the local spam quarantine, then enable the external quarantine. Simple enough, I think.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
7 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The key is to focus on the specific details of each statement and determine which one is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
7 months ago
I keep mixing up the commands; I thought POST was for changing settings, but now I'm not confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I think it might be B, but I'm not totally sure. I'll have to review my notes on the risk assessment process again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The log format doesn't look familiar, so I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
11 months ago
Option A - the classic 'build a validation rule' play. Solid, reliable, and about as exciting as watching paint dry. But hey, at least it gets the job done!
upvoted 0 times
Wilson
10 months ago
User 3: Agreed, it may not be the most exciting option, but it gets the job done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
10 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that seems like the most reliable way to ensure the data is captured properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
10 months ago
User 1: I think we should go with option A and build a validation rule on the Opportunity object.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anisha
11 months ago
Ah, the old 'make it a validation rule on the Opportunity Product' trick. Classic Salesforce move, but I'm not convinced it's the most elegant approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
11 months ago
Creating a new price book just for the service plans seems like overkill. I think the validation rule is a simpler and more targeted solution.
upvoted 0 times
Shonda
10 months ago
True, creating a new price book might be unnecessary for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
10 months ago
I think the validation rule on the Opportunity Product object would be too specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
11 months ago
But wouldn't configuring formula fields also help in capturing the data accurately?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
11 months ago
I agree, a validation rule on the Opportunity object would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Celestina
12 months ago
Option B sounds tempting, but that would just reflect the close date, not the actual service plan dates. We need to capture those custom dates separately.
upvoted 0 times
Arlette
10 months ago
A) That makes sense, we need to ensure we capture the custom dates for each service plan sold.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
10 months ago
D) Make a validation rule on the Opportunity Product object to require custom date fields based on the product family.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
11 months ago
A) Build a validation rule on the Opportunity object to require custom date fields based on the product(s) selected.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristal
12 months ago
A validation rule on the Opportunity object seems like the best way to ensure the service plan dates are captured correctly. That way, the user can't proceed without providing the necessary information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but option D also sounds reasonable. Requiring custom date fields based on the product family could be a good approach as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
1 year ago
I agree with Katina. Building a validation rule on the Opportunity object seems like the most efficient way to ensure proper data capture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
1 year ago
I think option A is the best choice. It makes sense to require custom date fields based on the product selected.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel