Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce ADX-201 Exam - Topic 9 Question 35 Discussion

Universal Containers has a private sharing model for Opportunities and uses Opportunity teams. Criteria-based sharing rules a sales rep at Universal Containers leaves the company and their user record is deactivated. The rep is later rehired in V administrator activates the old user record. The user is added to the same default Opportunity teams but h no longer able records the user worked on before leaving the company.What is the likely cause?
D) The records were manual shared with the user.
A) The stage of the Opportunity records was changed to closed lost.
B) Permission sets were removed when the user was deactivated.
C) The record type of the Opportunity records was changed.

Salesforce ADX-201 Exam - Topic 9 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's ADX-201 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 9
[All ADX-201 Questions]

Universal Containers has a private sharing model for Opportunities and uses Opportunity teams. Criteria-based sharing rules a sales rep at Universal Containers leaves the company and their user record is deactivated. The rep is later rehired in V administrator activates the old user record. The user is added to the same default Opportunity teams but h no longer able records the user worked on before leaving the company.

What is the likely cause?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Delisa at Oct 26, 2022, 04:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ADX-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Louvenia
10 months ago
Definitely not A, the stage wouldn’t affect access like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
10 months ago
What if the record type changed? That could be it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
10 months ago
Wait, how can they lose access to old records?
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
11 months ago
I agree, B seems right!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
11 months ago
Sounds like a permission issue to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
11 months ago
I wonder if the manual sharing aspect is important here. If the records were only shared with the user while they were active, then D might be the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
11 months ago
I feel like the stage of the Opportunity could impact visibility, but it seems unlikely that it would change just because the user was rehired.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
11 months ago
I think I saw a similar question where record types affected access, but I can't recall if that's relevant here. Could it be C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
11 months ago
I remember something about how user permissions can change when they're deactivated, so maybe it's B? But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Metabolism is a complex process, and I'm not sure if there's a single "main" hormone responsible for it. I'll have to review my notes on endocrine system regulation to be more confident in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
11 months ago
I've got this! Disabling macros without notification is a straightforward process in Excel. I'll just follow the steps in option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know BYOD can introduce security risks, but I'm not sure if the non-Windows hardware or GDPR issues are the primary concern. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel