MENU
The engineer is configuring a new application definition.
The customer wants an Audit record to be created with the error message, if provisioning fails.
Is this the rule an engineer should write to accomplish the goal?
Solution: Write an AfterProvisioning rule.
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium IdentityIQ Engineer Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
An AfterProvisioning rule in SailPoint IdentityIQ is typically used to execute custom logic after the provisioning process has been completed successfully. However, if provisioning fails, this rule will not be triggered because it is specifically designed for post-successful provisioning activities. To log an error message in the audit record when provisioning fails, a better approach would be to use a provisioning error handler or configure a specific workflow that captures errors and logs them accordingly. The AfterProvisioning rule is not the correct solution for this use case. Refer to the SailPoint IdentityIQ Provisioning and Workflow documentation for appropriate methods of handling provisioning errors and audit logging.
36 comments · newest first
CA
Carey
10 months ago
Not sure if that's the best approach, but it could work.
LE
Lemuel
11 months ago
Yup, AfterProvisioning is the way to go!
HU
Hubert
11 months ago
Wait, can you really log errors like that? Sounds risky!
SH
Shenika
11 months ago
I think it should be a BeforeProvisioning rule instead.
SI
Silvana
11 months ago
Definitely need an AfterProvisioning rule for that!
CO
Cory
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards "No" because I thought we needed to handle errors during the provisioning process itself, not after. But I could be mixing it up with another topic.
JO
Jose
12 months ago
I feel like AfterProvisioning is the right choice here because it captures the outcome of the provisioning, but I wish I could recall more about the specifics of error handling.
TH
Thomasena
12 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to log errors, and I think it was about using a different type of rule. Maybe it was a BeforeProvisioning rule?
AM
Ammie
1 year ago
I think writing an AfterProvisioning rule makes sense since it runs after the provisioning process, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right approach for logging errors.
LI
Linette
1 year ago
Yeah, the AfterProvisioning rule sounds like the appropriate solution to meet the customer's needs.
KE
Keva
1 year ago
I'm not totally confident about this. Let me think it through again to make sure I understand the requirements.
AL
Alaine
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The AfterProvisioning rule is the right choice to create an Audit record if provisioning fails.
MA
Malcolm
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Is there another type of rule we could use instead?
RE
Rebbecca
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the AfterProvisioning rule is the way to go here.
RO
Roxanne
1 year ago
Hmm, this question seems to be about business indicators used for process analytics. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which ones are true.
GO
Goldie
2 years ago
AfterProvisioning? Nah, that's like trying to fix a flat tire after the car's already in the ditch. 'ProvisioningFailureLogger' is where it's at!
LE
Leigha
2 years ago
Engineer: Let's go with ProvisioningFailureLogger then.
HE
Hector
2 years ago
Customer: No, ProvisioningFailureLogger is better for this.
EA
Earnestine
2 years ago
Engineer: AfterProvisioning rule is the way to go.
FR
France
2 years ago
In that case, the engineer should consider adding additional error handling logic.
ME
Melissa
2 years ago
But what if the provisioning fails before the AfterProvisioning rule is executed?
TE
Tess
2 years ago
I agree with Keshia, that rule should create an Audit record with the error message.
KE
Keshia
2 years ago
I think the engineer should write an AfterProvisioning rule.
LI
Lindsay
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced. Shouldn't we be using the 'ProvisioningErrorHandler' rule instead? Seems more appropriate for handling errors.
TY
Ty
2 years ago
Customer: No, I think the ProvisioningErrorHandler rule would be more appropriate.
GE
Gertude
2 years ago
Engineer: Yes, an AfterProvisioning rule should be written.
LO
Lorrine
2 years ago
No way, that's not the right rule. I'd go with the 'AfterProvisioningFailure' rule, much more specific to the task at hand.
GL
Glynda
2 years ago
I agree, AfterProvisioning is the way to go. Gotta love those error messages, they're like the spice of life in IT!
CH
Chandra
2 years ago
Yes, the AfterProvisioning rule is the right approach to create an Audit record on a provisioning failure. Seems straightforward to me.
LE
Leah
2 years ago
AfterProvisioning rule is the way to go
RE
Regenia
2 years ago
Customer: Agreed, it will help track any issues that may arise.
OZ
Ozell
2 years ago
That makes sense
EV
Evangelina
2 years ago
Engineer: It's important to have that in place for auditing purposes.
WE
Wenona
2 years ago
Yes
LE
Lemuel
2 years ago
Customer: Seems straightforward to me.
LU
Lucia
2 years ago
Engineer: Yes, the AfterProvisioning rule is the right approach to create an Audit record on a provisioning failure.