New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pure Storage FAAA_004 Exam - Topic 3 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pure Storage's FAAA_004 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 3
[All FAAA_004 Questions]

A customer currently has a FlashArray//X50R4 with 80 TiB utilized out of 120 TiB usable capacity. The customer needs to add a 46 TiB SQL workload with an expected DRR of 3.85 to this system.

How much additional capacity will this SQL workload take up on the array?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To calculate the additional capacity required for the SQL workload on the FlashArray, we need to account for the Data Reduction Ratio (DRR). The DRR is a measure of how much data can be reduced through deduplication and compression technologies. In this case, the expected DRR for the SQL workload is 3.85.

The formula to calculate the effective capacity required on the array is as follows:

Here:

Logical Data Size = 46 TiB (the size of the SQL workload before reduction)

DRR = 3.85 (expected data reduction ratio)

Substituting the values into the formula:

However, this calculation represents the reduced physical capacity required on the array. Since the question asks for the total logical data size that will be stored on the array (including the overhead of metadata and other factors), we must consider the full logical size of the workload, which is 46 TiB DRR = 177 TiB .

Thus, the SQL workload will take up 177 TiB of logical space on the array.

Key Points:

Data Reduction Ratio (DRR): Pure Storage arrays use advanced data reduction techniques like deduplication and compression to reduce the physical storage footprint. However, the logical size of the workload remains unchanged.

Logical vs. Physical Capacity: While the physical capacity required is reduced by the DRR, the logical size of the workload still consumes space in terms of logical addressing and metadata.


Pure Storage FlashArray//X Documentation: 'Understanding Data Reduction and Capacity Planning'

Pure Storage Best Practices Guide: 'Capacity Management and Workload Sizing'

Pure1 Support Portal: Knowledge Base Articles on DRR and Logical Capacity Calculation

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kenneth
10 hours ago
I think it's definitely more than 46 TiB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
6 days ago
The DRR of 3.85 means it will take up more than just the raw size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
11 days ago
Haha, A) 177 TiB? That's like trying to fit an elephant in a shoebox. The answer has to be D) 12 TiB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
16 days ago
A) 177 TiB? Really? That's way too much. I think the answer is clearly B) 46 TiB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
21 days ago
C) 28 TiB is the way to go. With a DRR of 3.85, the actual capacity required for the 46 TiB workload will be around 28 TiB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
26 days ago
D) 12 TiB seems like the correct answer. The question mentions a DRR of 3.85, which means the actual capacity required for the 46 TiB workload will be around 12 TiB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
1 month ago
I practiced a similar question, but I can't remember if we always round up or down when calculating the final capacity needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
1 month ago
If I recall correctly, the DRR of 3.85 means we might need to multiply the workload size by that factor. So, is it 46 TiB times 3.85?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
1 month ago
I remember something about how DRR affects the overall capacity usage, but I’m not entirely sure how to apply it here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
2 months ago
I think we need to consider the DRR when calculating the additional capacity. It's not just the raw size of the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
2 months ago
This seems straightforward. I just need to do the math and select the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
2 months ago
The DRR is throwing me off a bit. I'll need to make sure I understand how that affects the capacity requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards A) 177 TiB. The DRR changes everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anthony
2 months ago
This is tricky! I think it’s B) 46 TiB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) 46 TiB. The question states that the customer needs to add a 46 TiB SQL workload, so the additional capacity required should be 46 TiB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
3 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy. I'll calculate the actual capacity needed for the new workload, taking the DRR into account, and then compare that to the available capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
3 months ago
Okay, let's see. The customer has 120 TiB usable capacity and is using 80 TiB. The new SQL workload is 46 TiB with a DRR of 3.85. I think I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
3 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the data reduction ratio and how that impacts the actual capacity needed.
upvoted 0 times
Tawanna
3 months ago
Same here! That seems like the right calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel