Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PRMIA 8020 Exam - Topic 8 Question 8 Discussion

Posted by Jerlene on Mar 24, 2025 at 04:29 PM

In operational resilience, material customer detriment or significant harm to the customer is which of the following?

Suggested Answer: D

Step 1: Definition of Material Customer Detriment

Material customer detriment refers to service disruptions that cause financial loss, inability to access essential services, or significant hardship.

PRMIA and UK FCA Operational Resilience Standards define 'significant harm' as going beyond inconvenience to include monetary or operational distress.

Step 2: Why Option D is Correct

Significant harm occurs when customers face tangible financial or service losses, not just reputational inconvenience.

Regulatory frameworks (e.g., Basel, FCA, PRMIA) require banks to protect customers from material disruptions.

Step 3: Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

Option A ('Low threshold, any complaint') Incorrect because not all complaints indicate material detriment.

Option B ('Inconvenience and reputational damage') Incorrect because true material harm is more than just inconvenience.

Option C ('Financial system resilience') Incorrect because this describes systemic financial stability, not customer impact.

PRMIA Risk Reference Used:

PRMIA Operational Resilience Framework -- Defines material customer detriment.

UK FCA Operational Resilience Guidelines -- Requires firms to minimize severe harm to customers.

Final Conclusion:

Material customer detriment involves actual financial hardship, not just inconvenience, making Option D the correct answer.


Get Premium 8020 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
TH
Theresia 10 months ago
A is way too low of a threshold for this.
DA
Dante 10 months ago
I agree, D makes the most sense here.
JA
Jamal 10 months ago
Wait, isn't B also a valid point?
BE
Bette 10 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize the definition was so strict!
AN
Anastacia 11 months ago
Definitely think it's D. Material cost is key!
JA
Javier 11 months ago
I’m a bit confused; C talks about the financial system's ability to function, but I don’t think that directly relates to customer harm.
CH
Chantay 11 months ago
D sounds right to me because it mentions material cost or hardship, which aligns with what we discussed in class.
VA
Vallie 11 months ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned reputation damage, which makes me lean towards B, but I'm not entirely sure.
LE
Lettie 12 months ago
I think material customer detriment is more than just a complaint, so A seems too low threshold.
ST
Stephaine 12 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at now. Material customer detriment refers to significant harm or hardship to the customer, not just minor inconvenience. I'm confident D is the right answer.
PE
Pearly 12 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I know operational resilience is about a firm's ability to continue functioning during disruptions, so the answer is likely related to that. I'll eliminate the options that don't seem to fit.
CH
Chaya 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky, I'll need to read through the options carefully.
LA
Lawanda 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I think the answer is D based on the description of material customer detriment.
AL
Alesia 1 year ago
Haha, option C is like the financial system saying 'I'm fine, I'm fine!' even when it's crumbling around them. But D is definitely the winner here. Gotta protect those customers at all costs!
GL
Glen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alesia
User 2: Definitely, but option D is where the real impact is.
AD
Adelina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alesia
User 1: Haha, yeah, option C is like putting on a brave face.
EL
Elli 1 year ago
D all the way, no doubt about it. Anything less than a material impact is just a slap on the wrist. Time to bring out the big guns, folks!
SH
Shelba 1 year ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards B at first, but after reading the options again, I think D is the best fit. Gotta watch out for those pesky inconveniences though, am I right? *winks*
JO
Joesph 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think B could also be a possibility.
HI
Hillary 2 years ago
I agree with Simona. D is the way to go. Anything less than a material impact on the customer doesn't really qualify as 'significant harm' in my opinion.
WI
Wilford 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hillary
Yeah, anything less than a material cost or hardship doesn't seem like it would qualify as significant harm.
OL
Oliva 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hillary
I agree, D seems to capture the essence of significant harm to the customer.
MI
Ming 1 year ago
↳ replying to Hillary
I think D is the best option. It really shows the impact on the customer.
AL
Alaine 2 years ago
I agree with Louvenia, D makes sense because it involves material cost or hardship.
LO
Louvenia 2 years ago
I think the answer is D.
SI
Simona 2 years ago
Option D is clearly the correct answer here. Material customer detriment is when the disruption to a service results in a significant hardship or cost to the customer, not just an inconvenience.
RA
Ranee 1 year ago
↳ replying to Simona
User 3: Yes, it's not just about inconvenience, but actual financial impact.
MI
Mireya 1 year ago
↳ replying to Simona
User 2: I agree, material customer detriment is when there's a significant cost or hardship.
TA
Tamesha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Simona
User 1: I think option D is the right answer.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel