In operational resilience, material customer detriment or significant harm to the customer is which of the following?
Step 1: Definition of Material Customer Detriment
Material customer detriment refers to service disruptions that cause financial loss, inability to access essential services, or significant hardship.
PRMIA and UK FCA Operational Resilience Standards define 'significant harm' as going beyond inconvenience to include monetary or operational distress.
Step 2: Why Option D is Correct
Significant harm occurs when customers face tangible financial or service losses, not just reputational inconvenience.
Regulatory frameworks (e.g., Basel, FCA, PRMIA) require banks to protect customers from material disruptions.
Step 3: Why the Other Options Are Incorrect
Option A ('Low threshold, any complaint') Incorrect because not all complaints indicate material detriment.
Option B ('Inconvenience and reputational damage') Incorrect because true material harm is more than just inconvenience.
Option C ('Financial system resilience') Incorrect because this describes systemic financial stability, not customer impact.
PRMIA Risk Reference Used:
PRMIA Operational Resilience Framework -- Defines material customer detriment.
UK FCA Operational Resilience Guidelines -- Requires firms to minimize severe harm to customers.
Final Conclusion:
Material customer detriment involves actual financial hardship, not just inconvenience, making Option D the correct answer.
Theresia
2 months agoDante
2 months agoJamal
3 months agoBette
3 months agoAnastacia
3 months agoJavier
3 months agoChantay
4 months agoVallie
4 months agoLettie
4 months agoStephaine
4 months agoPearly
4 months agoChaya
5 months agoLawanda
5 months agoAlesia
10 months agoGlen
10 months agoAdelina
10 months agoElli
10 months agoShelba
10 months agoJoesph
11 months agoHillary
11 months agoWilford
10 months agoOliva
10 months agoMing
10 months agoAlaine
11 months agoLouvenia
11 months agoSimona
11 months agoRanee
10 months agoMireya
10 months agoTamesha
10 months ago