PRINCE2-Foundation Exam - Topic 5 Question 114 Discussion

Actual exam question for PRINCE2's PRINCE2-Foundation exam

Question #: 114
Topic #: 5

[All PRINCE2-Foundation Questions]

Which is a recommended quality review team role?

AProject Manager

BAssurance

CProject Support

DAdministrator

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

In PRINCE2 quality review meetings, the recommended roles include a Chair, Presenter, Reviewer, and an Administrator. The Administrator is crucial as they organize the logistics of the review meeting, ensure that the necessary materials are provided to the participants in advance, and take on the responsibility of recording results and follow-up actions. Project Manager, Assurance, and Project Support do not specifically align with the roles within a quality review team. Reference: PRINCE2 7 Foundation resources and study materials.

by Thaddeus at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PRINCE2-Foundation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lisbeth

19 days ago

A) Project Manager is the obvious choice. The project manager should be responsible for overseeing the quality review process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marisha

24 days ago

B) Assurance is the best option. Quality assurance is a critical role in ensuring the project meets the required standards.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jina

29 days ago

C) Chair is the correct answer. The quality review team should have a designated chair to facilitate the review process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shayne

1 month ago

From what I studied, Assurance seems to be the most relevant role in a quality review team, but I could be mixing it up with another topic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

1 month ago

I'm torn between Project Manager and Chair. I feel like both could fit, but I can't recall which one is specifically recommended.

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggie

1 month ago

I remember practicing a question about quality review roles, and I think Assurance was mentioned as a key role.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hermila

2 months ago

I think the Chair role is important for leading the team, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best answer here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malinda

2 months ago

I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not entirely sure what the differences are between the various quality review team roles. I'll have to make an educated guess on this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardo

2 months ago

I feel pretty confident about this one. The Chair role is responsible for facilitating the quality review process, so that's the recommended role mentioned in the question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merilyn

2 months ago

Okay, let me see. The question is asking about a recommended quality review team role, so I need to consider the different roles and which one would be most appropriate. I'll eliminate the ones that don't seem to fit and focus on the remaining options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alysa

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe I should review my notes on quality review team roles.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meaghan

3 months ago

I think the answer is C. The Chair role is responsible for leading the quality review team, so that seems like the recommended role.

upvoted 0 times

...