Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI PMP Exam - Topic 2 Question 121 Discussion

During a project kickoff meeting, two key stakeholders are arguing about the project scope and the acceptance of the deliverable. What should the project manager focus on to address the argument?
D) Reference the business case and confirm the common understanding of the project objectives and value creation.
A) Escalate the stakeholder misalignment with the project sponsor and seek direction for the deliverables.
B) Update the risk register first with scope discrepancies and then escalate it to the next level.
C) Arrange brainstorming with the stakeholders to complete the project scope statement and finalize the deliverable.

PMI PMP Exam - Topic 2 Question 121 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMP exam
Question #: 121
Topic #: 2
[All PMP Questions]

During a project kickoff meeting, two key stakeholders are arguing about the project scope and the acceptance of the deliverable. What should the project manager focus on to address the argument?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The correct answer is D because the scenario requires disciplined stakeholder engagement rather than an immediate, informal, or purely administrative reaction. The selected response --- D. Reference the business case and confirm the common understanding of the project objectives and value creation. --- directly addresses the condition described in the question and keeps the project aligned with authorized objectives. PMBOK-aligned practice requires the project manager to clarify expectations, preserve transparency, and use the appropriate decision or communication channel. This is especially important when project constraints, stakeholder expectations, quality expectations, delivery cadence, or business value may be affected. The competing options are weaker because they either bypass the accountable role, defer action without analysis, escalate before the project manager has prepared decision-quality information, or solve a symptom without correcting the underlying process issue. The selected answer also preserves transparency, ownership, and traceability, which are essential for sound project governance and effective delivery. PMBOK Guide Eighth Edition topics: business environment, stakeholder engagement, stakeholder communication, impact analysis, governance, value delivery, and continuous improvement.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Carin
3 days ago
I think D is the best choice. Aligning on objectives is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
8 days ago
C could work too, but it might lead to more confusion if not managed well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
13 days ago
B sounds smart, but it might slow things down too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
19 days ago
Wait, can referencing the business case really solve their argument? Seems too simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
24 days ago
Totally agree with D! Keeps everyone on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
29 days ago
I think D is the best choice. Aligning on objectives is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
1 month ago
Updating the risk register sounds important, but I’m not convinced that should be the first step. Maybe option B isn't the best approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
1 month ago
I think brainstorming with the stakeholders could help clarify the scope, but I wonder if that would take too long. Option C feels risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
1 month ago
I'm not entirely sure, but escalating to the project sponsor might be necessary if the argument gets out of hand. Option A could be a safe bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
2 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of aligning stakeholders on project objectives, so option D seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel