Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PMI-RMP Exam - Topic 6 Question 104 Discussion

A project manager was informed that the testing of the latest component in the project's software update release was not successful. As a result, 1he delivery timelines for the software release wifi be delayed, The project manager did not previously capture this as a risk to the project.What should the project manager do next to avoid similar risks?
B) Reassess risks with a new assumptions and constraints analysis.
A) Add contingencies to other tasks to mitigate similar risks.
C) Review the risk response plan looking for lessons learned.
D) Log the event in the issue log and update the project management plan.

PMI-RMP Exam - Topic 6 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-RMP exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 6
[All PMI-RMP Questions]

A project manager was informed that the testing of the latest component in the project's software update release was not successful. As a result, 1he delivery timelines for the software release wifi be delayed, The project manager did not previously capture this as a risk to the project.

What should the project manager do next to avoid similar risks?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The project manager should reassess risks by conducting a new assumptions and constraints analysis. This will help identify any previously overlooked risks and ensure that the risk register is comprehensive and up-to-date.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Leonora
5 months ago
Totally agree with reviewing the risk response plan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
6 months ago
Not sure if adding contingencies will really help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
6 months ago
I think logging the event is crucial too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
6 months ago
Definitely need to reassess risks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
6 months ago
Surprised they didn’t see this coming!
upvoted 0 times
...
King
6 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think reassessing risks is crucial. Option B really stands out to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
7 months ago
I feel like logging the event is important, but it might not prevent future risks. I wonder if option D is enough on its own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think adding contingencies might not address the root cause. Maybe option C could help us learn from this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
7 months ago
I remember we talked about the importance of reassessing risks after a setback, so option B seems like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
7 months ago
Logging the event and updating the project management plan is probably the most straightforward approach. That way, the team can learn from this experience and be better prepared going forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
8 months ago
Reassessing the assumptions and constraints is a smart move. That could help uncover other potential risks that haven't been accounted for yet. I'll make sure to consider that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
8 months ago
Hmm, I think the key here is to prevent similar risks from occurring in the future. Adding contingencies to other tasks seems like a good way to build in some extra cushion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Should I be focusing on identifying new risks or addressing the specific risk that caused the delay? I'm not sure which approach would be best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward risk management question. I'd start by reviewing the risk response plan to see if there are any lessons learned that could be applied here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
10 months ago
I believe logging the event in the issue log and updating the project management plan is crucial for tracking and managing risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
10 months ago
Adding contingencies to other tasks could also help mitigate similar risks in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
10 months ago
Haha, this reminds me of that time our team forgot to account for leap year in our software release. Gotta love those 'unexpected' risks, am I right? Definitely going with B on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Marva
10 months ago
I agree, we need to make sure we cover all our bases next time. B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
10 months ago
Yeah, unexpected risks always seem to pop up at the worst times. B is a good choice to reassess everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryan
10 months ago
I agree with Aliza, it's important to review and update the risk assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
11 months ago
Ah, the classic project management dilemma. I'd have to go with B - can't fix the problem without understanding where it came from.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
11 months ago
Option D seems like the easiest choice, but it doesn't really address the root cause of the issue. I think B is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Tatum
10 months ago
B: Yes, reassessing risks with new assumptions and constraints analysis is crucial for avoiding similar risks in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
10 months ago
A: I agree, option B would help us identify the root cause of the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aliza
11 months ago
I think the project manager should reassess risks with a new assumptions and constraints analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Niesha
11 months ago
The correct answer is B. Reassessing risks with a new assumptions and constraints analysis is the best way to avoid similar risks in the future.
upvoted 0 times
Candra
10 months ago
C) Review the risk response plan looking for lessons learned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
10 months ago
B) Reassess risks with a new assumptions and constraints analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
10 months ago
A) Add contingencies to other tasks to mitigate similar risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel