New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PMI-PBA Exam - Topic 2 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for PMI's PMI-PBA exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 2
[All PMI-PBA Questions]

The sales team of a company has won a time-and-malerial project. The business analyst discovers that the sales team has underestimated the required budget and schedule

Which course of action should the business analyst take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Johnetta at Jan 28, 2024, 10:33 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PMI-PBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Izetta
3 months ago
I’m surprised they underestimated it in the first place!
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
3 months ago
Option D seems risky, but it’s honest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
4 months ago
Wait, why would we just accept a budget that’s too low?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
4 months ago
Totally agree, we need to negotiate the scope!
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
4 months ago
I think option C makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
4 months ago
I recall that accepting the contract and only delivering what fits the budget isn't a good practice, so I think option A is definitely not the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the focus was on communication. I feel like option D could be risky, but it might be necessary to keep the client informed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think accepting the contract and notifying the customer about the potential for a cost overrun might lead to issues later on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of managing stakeholder expectations, so maybe option C could be the best approach to negotiate the scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Option D seems like the safest bet - accept the contract and then let the customer know about the potential for a cost overrun. That way we can still do the work without risking the relationship.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
5 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Developing a requirements baseline and using that to negotiate the scope seems like the most responsible approach. It shows the customer we're being upfront about the issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused here. Should I just accept the contract and hope for the best, or try to get the customer to cancel it? I'm not sure what the best approach is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky situation. I'm not sure if I should go with option A and just deliver what fits the budget, or try to renegotiate the scope with the customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
5 months ago
I'm confident that the answer is E. Administrators can manage the virtual machines by using Microsoft Endpoint Manager, which is a unique feature of Microsoft 365 compared to Azure Virtual Desktop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm not sure if the campaign ROI or the discount approval time reports would be that relevant to the issue of longer sales cycles. I'll have to think this through more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
2 years ago
It's a tough call, but I think the requirements baseline and scope negotiation is the way to go. At least that way, the client is informed and can make a decision based on the actual needs and constraints. Trying to hide the budget and schedule issues is just going to backfire in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 years ago
Absolutely. Transparency is key here. Notifying the client about the potential for a cost overrun is just asking for trouble. They're gonna feel like they've been blindsided, and that's not going to go over well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. And refusing to work on the project? That's just going to damage the company's reputation. The best option seems to be developing a requirements baseline and negotiating the scope. That way, the client knows what they're getting upfront.
upvoted 0 times
Genevieve
2 years ago
Agreed, setting clear expectations from the beginning can prevent misunderstandings later on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
2 years ago
C) Develop a requirements baseline document and use it to negotiate the scope in the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
2 years ago
Yes, honesty is key in these situations. Keeping the customer informed is essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
2 years ago
D) Accept the contract, and then notify the customer about the potential for a cost overrun.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
2 years ago
That's a good point. It's important to be transparent with the client.
upvoted 0 times
...
Misty
2 years ago
C) Develop a requirements baseline document and use it to negotiate the scope in the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Flo
2 years ago
Wow, this question really puts the business analyst in a tricky situation. I mean, accepting the contract and only delivering part of the requirements seems like a bad idea. That's just setting the client up for disappointment, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel