Well, if the senior managers can't agree on what's critical, how will they ever justify the P3O to themselves? Option C is the way to go, in my opinion.
Haha, I think option D is a bit of a wild card. Defining the lifecycle for a permanent P3O doesn't really address the question of why senior managers need to agree on critical PPM problems.
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A sounds like it's more about the prioritization technique itself, rather than the need for senior manager agreement. I'm leaning towards C or B.
Option C seems like the best choice to me. Justifying the investment in a P3O to senior management is a key reason for gaining consensus on critical PPM problems.
I think option B makes the most sense. Getting senior managers to agree on critical PPM problems is crucial for aligning the P3O vision across the organization.
Delfina
26 days agoBasilia
19 hours agoMarci
1 months agoAlecia
2 days agoDallas
17 days agoMalika
1 months agoNoah
1 months agoScot
1 months agoVelda
1 months agoVeronika
24 days agoAugustine
27 days agoShelia
29 days agoCherry
30 days agoFletcher
1 months agoCorrie
1 months agoAudry
2 months agoRoxanne
2 months agoValentin
28 days agoCorazon
29 days agoMabel
1 months agoCatherin
1 months agoLera
2 months ago