Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PeopleCert ITIL 4 Foundation Exam - Topic 2 Question 26 Discussion

Which statement about managing incidents is CORRECT?
C) Low impact incidents should be resolved efficiently so the resource required is reduced
A) Low impact incidents should be resolved efficiently, making logging unnecessary
B) The 'incident management' practice should use a single process regardless of the impact of the incident
D) Incidents with the lowest impact should be resolved first

PeopleCert ITIL 4 Foundation Exam - Topic 2 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for PeopleCert's ITIL 4 Foundation exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 2
[All ITIL 4 Foundation Questions]

Which statement about managing incidents is CORRECT?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Novella at May 07, 2022, 03:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ITIL 4 Foundation Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Royal
10 months ago
Resolving low impact incidents efficiently makes sense to save resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
10 months ago
A single process for all incidents? That sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
10 months ago
Wait, are we really prioritizing low impact incidents first? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
10 months ago
Totally agree, efficiency is key for low impact issues!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
10 months ago
I think low impact incidents still need logging for tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
11 months ago
D seems off to me; I thought we learned that not all low impact incidents should be resolved first, especially if they don't affect critical services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
11 months ago
C sounds familiar because I think we practiced a question about prioritizing resources effectively, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
11 months ago
I’m not sure about B, but I feel like we talked about adapting processes based on incident impact in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Inocencia
11 months ago
I remember we discussed that low impact incidents still need to be logged for tracking purposes, so I think A is definitely wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
11 months ago
Rough-cut capacity planning seems like it could be a good option for monitoring loads and capacities. I'll make sure to consider that one as well as the other choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards CCX and NETCONF, but CCX seems less familiar. Maybe I need to look it up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
11 months ago
LDP autodiscovery is another concept we covered, but I don't recall it being directly related to checking connectivity between PE routers. Maybe it's MPLS OAM after all.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel