Pegasystems PEGAPCSSA87V1 Exam - Topic 3 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGAPCSSA87V1 exam

Question #: 43
Topic #: 3

Your application contains the following versions of a service level named AuthorizeClaim.

The application is being updated with a new version of the AccountManage ruleset. As part of the update, the service level is no longer circumstanced for AccountOpen cases. The update must retain the circumstancing for the other case types in the application.

Which option do you use to reset the circumstancing for the AccountOpen case type?

ACopy the non-circumstanced rule to the AccountOpen class and select the base rule option.

BMake the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class unavailable.

CWithdraw the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class.

DBlock the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Nida at Sep 15, 2024, 03:54 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGAPCSSA87V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Deeanna

3 months ago

I agree with C, it’s the cleanest solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bronwyn

3 months ago

Wait, can you really just block the rules? Sounds odd!

upvoted 0 times

...

Emogene

3 months ago

A is definitely not the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Moon

4 months ago

I think B could work too, but not sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lewis

4 months ago

Option C seems like the right choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melina

4 months ago

Copying the non-circumstanced rule sounds familiar, but I can't recall if that's the best option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sunny

4 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the difference between blocking and withdrawing rules. Which one actually resets the circumstancing?

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

4 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where we had to reset circumstancing, and I feel like withdrawing the rules might be the right move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dusti

5 months ago

I remember something about making rules unavailable, but I'm not sure if that applies here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fausto

5 months ago

I'm a little unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully and maybe even jot down some notes to make sure I don't miss anything important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Percy

5 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The key is to focus on retaining the circumstancing for the other case types, while resetting the circumstancing for the AccountOpen case. Option A looks like the cleanest way to do that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dean

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Based on the information provided, I'd go with option A. Copying the non-circumstanced rule and selecting the base rule option seems like the best way to retain the circumstancing for the other case types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carolynn

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to re-read the question and the options a few times to make sure I understand exactly what's being asked.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawanna

5 months ago

This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the implications of each one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kati

1 year ago

Option C all the way! Withdrawing the rules is like hitting the reset button - simple and effective.

upvoted 0 times

Janey

1 year ago

Yeah, it's a simple and effective way to handle the update.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nu

1 year ago

I think it's a straightforward solution to the problem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Holley

1 year ago

It's definitely the easiest way to reset the circumstancing for the AccountOpen case type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jodi

1 year ago

I agree, withdrawing the circumstanced rules is the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonie

1 year ago

Option A sounds like a lot of extra work. Why copy the rule when you can just withdraw the circumstanced ones instead?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenita

1 year ago

Personally, I think Option D is the way to go. Blocking the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class is a more robust solution.

upvoted 0 times

Melissia

1 year ago

Blocking the circumstanced rules will ensure the update retains the circumstancing for other case types in the application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Estrella

1 year ago

I agree, blocking the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class seems like the most effective solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lilli

1 year ago

Option D is a good choice. It will help maintain the circumstancing for other case types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Horace

1 year ago

But if we copy the non-circumstanced rule to the AccountOpen class, we can retain the circumstancing for other case types.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casandra

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Angella

1 year ago

I'd go with Option B. Making the circumstanced rules unavailable is a quick and easy fix for this situation.

upvoted 0 times

Huey

1 year ago

Blocking the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class could be too drastic of a measure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Minna

1 year ago

I think withdrawing the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class might cause issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Temeka

1 year ago

But wouldn't copying the non-circumstanced rule to the AccountOpen class also work?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

1 year ago

I agree, Option B seems like the most straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Horace

1 year ago

I think the answer is A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winfred

1 year ago

Option C is the way to go. Withdrawing the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class seems like the cleanest solution to me.

upvoted 0 times

Fatima

1 year ago

Yes, it will ensure that the circumstancing is reset for the AccountOpen case type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aaron

1 year ago

I agree, withdrawing the circumstanced rules in the AccountOpen class is the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...