Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems PEGACPSA23V1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 44 Discussion

Users create Insurance Coverage Request Cases to authorize insurance payments. Users enter information that includes the name of the patient, the date of the procedure and the type of the procedure. After entering the information, the user submits the request for a review of the patient's insurance policy. Because multiple users enter requests, the duplicate requests can occur. A request is considered a duplicate if the patient name, procedure type, and procedure date match an existing request. You have been given two requirements:Ensure that users can identify duplicate requests. If a case is duplicated, it is not written to the database. Otherwise, write the case to the database. Which two options configure the application so that users can identify duplicate requests? (Choose two)
A) Add a duplicate search step to the case life cycle design. and B) Configure a duplicate search decision table and add it to a Decision shape
C) Configure weighted conditions.
D) Configure a validation rule to validate matching cases.

Pegasystems PEGACPSA23V1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA23V1 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 4
[All PEGACPSA23V1 Questions]

Users create Insurance Coverage Request Cases to authorize insurance payments. Users enter information that includes the name of the patient, the date of the procedure and the type of the procedure. After entering the information, the user submits the request for a review of the patient's insurance policy. Because multiple users enter requests, the duplicate requests can occur. A request is considered a duplicate if the patient name, procedure type, and procedure date match an existing request. You have been given two requirements:

Ensure that users can identify duplicate requests. If a case is duplicated, it is not written to the database. Otherwise, write the case to the database. Which two options configure the application so that users can identify duplicate requests? (Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

To prevent duplicate insurance coverage request cases from being entered into the database, the following configurations would be appropriate:

A . Add a duplicate search step to the case life cycle design. This step is integrated into the case life cycle to automatically check for duplicates at a specific point in the case processing, typically before the data is submitted for further processing or saved to the database.

B . Configure a duplicate search decision table and add it to a Decision shape. This approach uses a decision table to define the criteria for what constitutes a duplicate (e.g., matching patient name, procedure type, and date). The decision shape then uses this table to determine if the current case is a duplicate, preventing it from proceeding if it is.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Yolande
2 days ago
C) seems unnecessary, we just need to check for exact matches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
7 days ago
Totally agree with A), it makes sense to add that step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
12 days ago
Wait, can we really trust the validation rule?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
17 days ago
I think B) is the better option for decision making.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
22 days ago
A) sounds good for catching duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
28 days ago
I’m leaning towards the validation rule option, but I’m not confident if it would catch all duplicate cases effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
1 month ago
Weighted conditions seem a bit off for this scenario; I don't recall them being relevant for checking duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 month ago
I remember practicing with decision tables, so I feel like option B could be a good choice for identifying duplicates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 month ago
I think adding a duplicate search step to the case life cycle design makes sense, but I'm not entirely sure how that would work in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel