Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Pegasystems Exam PEGACPSA23V1 Topic 1 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPSA23V1 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 1
[All PEGACPSA23V1 Questions]

How do you identify if a result in a decision rule cannot be returned?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

To satisfy the security requirement for a new analyst who needs a combination of accesses from two different personas:

B . Create a new Analyst persona with the required access. By creating a custom persona, you can tailor the access rights to precisely fit the unique combination of permissions needed by the analyst, without altering the existing personas or granting broader access than necessary.


by Marilynn at Feb 10, 2025, 06:02 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PEGACPSA23V1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Shannon
16 days ago
Testing for conflicts? More like testing for comedic value! I bet I could come up with some real head-scratchers if I tried.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
25 days ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. Completeness and conflict testing both sound like solid strategies. Maybe I'll just flip a coin!
upvoted 0 times
Niesha
15 days ago
B) Test for completeness
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
18 days ago
A) Test for missing conditions
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nina
1 months ago
Unit testing is always a good idea, but in this case, I'd say option D is the most relevant. Checking for conflicts is the best way to find those edge cases.
upvoted 0 times
Tarra
20 days ago
I agree, testing for conflicts is crucial to ensure all possible scenarios are covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
1 months ago
Completeness is key, so I'd go with option B. Making sure the rule covers all possible scenarios is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
Jules
24 hours ago
I think testing for completeness is the most important step. Option B is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
19 days ago
Testing for completeness is essential to avoid any missed scenarios. Option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
27 days ago
I agree, option B is the way to go. We need to ensure all conditions are covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kaycee
2 months ago
I believe testing for conflicts is also important to ensure accurate results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
2 months ago
I think testing for missing conditions is the way to go. That's the most straightforward approach to identify if a result cannot be returned.
upvoted 0 times
Vicente
2 days ago
Testing the rule using a unit test can also help catch any issues with returning results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
4 days ago
I agree, it's a crucial step in ensuring the decision rule works as intended.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
18 days ago
Testing for missing conditions is definitely important to identify if a result cannot be returned.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kallie
2 months ago
I agree with Bonita, testing for missing conditions is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bonita
2 months ago
I think we should test for missing conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel