MENU
How do you identify if a result in a decision rule cannot be returned?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium PEGACPSA23V1 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
To satisfy the security requirement for a new analyst who needs a combination of accesses from two different personas:
B . Create a new Analyst persona with the required access. By creating a custom persona, you can tailor the access rights to precisely fit the unique combination of permissions needed by the analyst, without altering the existing personas or granting broader access than necessary.
43 comments · newest first
CR
Craig
10 months ago
Not sure about that, seems a bit off to me.
DA
Dahlia
11 months ago
Wait, can you really test for missing conditions?
SH
Shantell
11 months ago
A unit test sounds like a solid approach.
KI
Kimbery
11 months ago
I think testing for conflicts is key too.
ME
Melodie
11 months ago
Definitely test for completeness!
KA
Karl
12 months ago
Testing for conflicts sounds familiar, but I’m unsure if that’s the main focus for this question.
LO
Louisa
12 months ago
Unit tests seem relevant, but I feel like they might not directly address the issue of results not being returned.
ST
Stephaine
12 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to test for completeness, but I can't recall if that's the same as identifying non-returnable results.
JU
Judy
1 year ago
I think we talked about testing for missing conditions in class, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right approach here.
AR
Arletta
1 year ago
Ah, this is a good one. I'd start by testing for missing conditions in the decision rule. That seems like the most straightforward approach to ensure a result can always be returned. I'll make sure to double-check my work, though, just to be safe.
GA
Gary
1 year ago
I think the key here is to identify if there are any issues with the decision rule that could prevent a result from being returned. Testing for missing conditions or conflicts seems like the way to go. I'll make sure to carefully read through the question and consider all the options.
CH
Chantell
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we need to check if the result can be returned, but I'm not sure if testing for completeness or conflicts is the right way to go about it. Maybe I should review the course material on decision rules again.
JU
Judy
1 year ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd probably start by testing for missing conditions in the decision rule, since that seems like the most logical approach.
SH
Shannon
1 year ago
Testing for conflicts? More like testing for comedic value! I bet I could come up with some real head-scratchers if I tried.
FE
Felicia
1 year ago
D) Test for conflicts
JI
Jimmie
1 year ago
C) Test the rule using a unit test
FL
Floyd
1 year ago
B) Test for completeness
RE
Regenia
1 year ago
A) Test for missing conditions
PI
Pilar
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. Completeness and conflict testing both sound like solid strategies. Maybe I'll just flip a coin!
NO
Noah
1 year ago
Good point, I'll make sure to cover all bases before making a decision.
DE
Demetra
1 year ago
I agree, but don't forget to also check for missing conditions to ensure accuracy.
MI
Mica
1 year ago
I think testing for conflicts is crucial to identify any issues.
TH
Theresia
1 year ago
D) Test for conflicts
DO
Donte
1 year ago
C) Test the rule using a unit test
NI
Niesha
1 year ago
B) Test for completeness
SH
Shawnee
1 year ago
A) Test for missing conditions
NI
Nina
1 year ago
Unit testing is always a good idea, but in this case, I'd say option D is the most relevant. Checking for conflicts is the best way to find those edge cases.
NA
Nan
1 year ago
I always make sure to test for conflicts before finalizing any decision rule.
CE
Cecil
1 year ago
Unit testing is important, but conflicts can really mess up the decision rule.
TA
Tarra
1 year ago
I agree, testing for conflicts is crucial to ensure all possible scenarios are covered.
VA
Vallie
1 year ago
Completeness is key, so I'd go with option B. Making sure the rule covers all possible scenarios is crucial.
IS
Isreal
1 year ago
Completeness is definitely key in decision rules. Option B is the best way to identify any missing conditions.
JU
Jules
1 year ago
I think testing for completeness is the most important step. Option B is the right answer.
JA
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
Testing for completeness is essential to avoid any missed scenarios. Option B is the best choice.
RO
Rolande
1 year ago
I agree, option B is the way to go. We need to ensure all conditions are covered.
KA
Kaycee
2 years ago
I believe testing for conflicts is also important to ensure accurate results.
HU
Hubert
2 years ago
I think testing for missing conditions is the way to go. That's the most straightforward approach to identify if a result cannot be returned.
RE
Regenia
1 year ago
True, testing for completeness and conflicts are also important to consider in the process.
VI
Vicente
1 year ago
Testing the rule using a unit test can also help catch any issues with returning results.
IL
Ilona
1 year ago
I agree, it's a crucial step in ensuring the decision rule works as intended.
CA
Carole
1 year ago
Testing for missing conditions is definitely important to identify if a result cannot be returned.
KA
Kallie
2 years ago
I agree with Bonita, testing for missing conditions is crucial.
BO
Bonita
2 years ago
I think we should test for missing conditions.