Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Pegasystems PEGACPLSA23V1 Exam - Topic 3 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Pegasystems's PEGACPLSA23V1 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 3
[All PEGACPLSA23V1 Questions]

[Application Design]

Which two of the following business use cases require the case-instance-first design pattern for implementation in Pega applications? (Choose Two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Chu
1 day ago
Wait, how does C even relate to case-instance-first? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
6 days ago
No way, D is more about a process flow, not case-instance-first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
11 days ago
I think B fits too, but not sure about A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
17 days ago
A and C are definitely case-instance-first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
22 days ago
This exam question is making my head spin like a case-instance carousel. Time to grab a coffee and tackle it again!
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
27 days ago
A and C are the clear winners here. I'm just glad I don't have to take this exam - I'd probably end up with a case of the "case-instance-first" jitters!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marquetta
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about B. Isn't that more of an approval process than a case-instance-first scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
William
2 months ago
I agree with Penney. A and C make the most sense for the case-instance-first pattern. D is more of a generic e-commerce flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
2 months ago
A and C are the correct answers. The case-instance-first pattern is used when the case is the primary focus, and other activities are performed within the context of that case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
2 months ago
I’m confused about D because it seems more like a straightforward process without needing a case instance first. I lean towards A and C, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
2 months ago
I recall a similar question where we discussed the importance of case-instance-first for processes that require prior data collection. I feel like A and D could fit that pattern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
2 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about case-instance-first being important for scenarios where you need to gather information before moving forward. Maybe B and C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
3 months ago
I think options A and C might be the right answers since they both seem to involve specific case instances that need to be handled first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
3 months ago
I think I've got it! A and C are the ones that require the case-instance-first design pattern because the user is being assigned to an existing case or the patient's history is being captured before the rest of the process. B and D are more about creating a new case as the user goes through the flow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
3 months ago
I'm pretty confident that A and C are the correct answers here. The case-instance-first pattern is about creating the case first, and then adding the relevant information to it, which is what's happening in those two use cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
3 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. A and C seem to fit the pattern where the case is created first, and then the user or patient information is added to it. B and D seem to be more about creating a new case as the user goes through the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiann
3 months ago
Hmm, I think A and C might require the case-instance-first pattern since the user is assigned to an existing case and the patient's history is captured before further processing. But I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The case-instance-first pattern seems to be related to processes where the case is created first, but I'm not confident in applying that to these specific use cases.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel