New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam - Topic 5 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 5
[All ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions]

Based on scenario 8. how does the HealthGenic's negligence affect the ISMS certificate?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Keneth at Sep 16, 2024, 05:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Paulene
3 months ago
I’m surprised they didn’t catch that! How do you miss management reviews?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
3 months ago
C could be a factor too, but B feels more critical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure they didn't have any incidents? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
4 months ago
Totally agree, B is the right choice! Negligence can't be overlooked.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
4 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense. No management reviews? That's a big deal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
4 months ago
I thought that as long as they had no incidents, they might be fine, but I guess the management reviews are really important too. I'm leaning towards B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
4 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and it was about the importance of audits. Option C could be a factor in not renewing the certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think if they didn't have any incidents, they could still renew the certificate. Option A seems a bit misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how management reviews are crucial for maintaining the ISMS certificate, so option B might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
5 months ago
I think I've got a good handle on this. Option B seems the most plausible, as failure to follow ISMS procedures could prevent them from renewing the certificate, even without a detected incident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Does "negligence" refer to a specific incident, or more general issues with their information security management system? That could impact the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
5 months ago
Based on the information provided, option B seems most likely. If they haven't been conducting management reviews as planned, that could jeopardize their certification renewal.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
5 months ago
Hmm, the key seems to be whether HealthGenic's negligence would affect their ability to renew the ISMS certificate. I'll need to carefully consider the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the scenario details before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The key details are that the doctor submitted separate charges for different parts of the procedure, when they should have been bundled together. Based on that, I'm leaning towards "Unbundling" as the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
1 year ago
The internal audit taking longer than planned is concerning, but not as critical as the lack of management reviews. Option B for the win!
upvoted 0 times
Gene
1 year ago
Option B is definitely the best choice to address the negligence affecting the ISMS certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
1 year ago
Yes, without proper management reviews, the ISMS certificate could be at risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
1 year ago
I agree, the lack of management reviews is a major issue for the ISMS certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elden
1 year ago
Yes, and without meeting all the criteria, they might not be able to renew the certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
1 year ago
Haha, looks like HealthGenic needs to get their act together. Option B is the way to go, otherwise they might as well start looking for a new certification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
1 year ago
I agree with Buck. Conducting management reviews is a critical requirement for maintaining an ISMS certificate. Option B is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Aja
1 year ago
It's important for HealthGenic to address this issue to ensure they maintain their ISMS certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
1 year ago
Yes, Option B states that failure to conduct management reviews can result in non-compliance with ISMS requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
1 year ago
I think HealthGenic's negligence in conducting management reviews could lead to a loss of their ISMS certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Estrella
1 year ago
I agree. Option B mentions the lack of management reviews, which is a requirement for renewal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 year ago
Option B seems the most likely. If HealthGenic hasn't conducted management reviews, that's a major non-conformity that could jeopardize their ISMS certification.
upvoted 0 times
Vashti
1 year ago
They need to address this issue as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
1 year ago
It could jeopardize their ISMS certification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
1 year ago
If HealthGenic hasn't conducted management reviews, that's a major non-conformity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 year ago
Option B seems the most likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elden
1 year ago
I think HealthGenic's negligence will affect the ISMS certificate renewal.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel