Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam - Topic 4 Question 47 Discussion

Posted by Armando on Sep 14, 2024 at 08:27 PM

The auditor discovered that two out of 15 employees of the IT Department have not received adequate information security training. What does this represent?

Suggested Answer: A

This scenario represents an 'audit finding.' An audit finding refers to results that indicate a deviation from the expected performance or standards. Discovering that two employees have not received the required training is an audit finding indicating noncompliance with the organization's training requirements.


Get Premium ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
LA
Lanie 10 months ago
Not sure if it's just an audit finding, could be more than that.
ST
Staci 11 months ago
Sounds like a serious oversight to me!
EM
Emerson 11 months ago
Wait, only 2 out of 15? That seems low for a department like IT.
CE
Celestina 11 months ago
I agree, it shows a gap in training.
CE
Ceola 11 months ago
That's definitely an audit finding.
KI
King 12 months ago
I definitely recall that audit findings point out issues, so I would go with option A for this one.
HE
Hershel 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards audit finding too, but could it also be considered an information source? I’m a bit confused.
LI
Lilli 12 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed audit evidence, but this feels more like a finding to me.
GL
Glenna 1 year ago
I think this might be an audit finding since it highlights a gap in training, but I'm not completely sure.
CH
Cherry 1 year ago
I'm confident the answer is A. Audit finding. The question is clearly describing a finding from the auditor's work, so that's the best fit among the options provided.
RA
Raul 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking what the information about the two employees who didn't receive training represents. Since it's directly related to the audit, the answer must be "Audit finding."
LE
Leandro 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to make sure I understand the difference between an audit finding, audit evidence, and information source. Let me think this through step-by-step.
TI
Titus 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward audit finding question. I'll carefully read through the options and think about what the information provided represents.
GE
Georgene 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. We need to ensure all the apps can access the resources in Vnet1 without going through the internet. I'm guessing the number of integration subnets has something to do with that.
CA
Catalina 2 years ago
I'd say this is a classic case of 'security through obscurity' - out of sight, out of mind. Time to shine a light on that dark corner of the IT department!
CI
Ciara 2 years ago
↳ replying to Catalina
C) Information source
LI
Lilli 2 years ago
↳ replying to Catalina
B) Audit evidence
NY
Nydia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Catalina
A) Audit finding
RE
Reita 2 years ago
Haha, looks like those two employees need to watch some 'Cybersecurity for Dummies' videos ASAP!
IE
Iesha 2 years ago
↳ replying to Reita
C) Information source
MO
Mollie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Reita
B) Audit evidence
DE
Devora 2 years ago
↳ replying to Reita
A) Audit finding
HE
Henriette 2 years ago
But could it also be considered audit evidence of a potential risk?
MI
Minna 2 years ago
I agree with Latia, it shows a gap in training.
ZE
Zena 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Couldn't this also be considered an information source for the auditor to further investigate the training processes?
AR
Arlette 2 years ago
↳ replying to Zena
It could be both an audit finding and an information source for further investigation.
LE
Leonor 2 years ago
↳ replying to Zena
C) Information source
DE
Desirae 2 years ago
↳ replying to Zena
B) Audit evidence
YO
Youlanda 2 years ago
↳ replying to Zena
A) Audit finding
CH
Chauncey 2 years ago
I agree, this is definitely audit evidence that the company needs to address their security training program.
TA
Tamar 2 years ago
↳ replying to Chauncey
C) Information source
CR
Cristina 2 years ago
↳ replying to Chauncey
B) Audit evidence
TW
Twila 2 years ago
↳ replying to Chauncey
A) Audit finding
FL
Flo 2 years ago
This seems like a clear-cut audit finding to me. Two out of 15 employees lacking proper training is definitely a red flag.
MA
Malcolm 2 years ago
↳ replying to Flo
Yes, it's important to address this issue as soon as possible.
CA
Cassie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Flo
I agree, it's definitely an audit finding.
SA
Sage 2 years ago
↳ replying to Flo
C) Information source
KA
Kathrine 2 years ago
↳ replying to Flo
B) Audit evidence
OM
Omer 2 years ago
↳ replying to Flo
A) Audit finding
LA
Latia 2 years ago
I think it's an audit finding.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel