New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam - Topic 4 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 4
[All ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions]

The auditor discovered that two out of 15 employees of the IT Department have not received adequate information security training. What does this represent?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

This scenario represents an 'audit finding.' An audit finding refers to results that indicate a deviation from the expected performance or standards. Discovering that two employees have not received the required training is an audit finding indicating noncompliance with the organization's training requirements.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lanie
3 months ago
Not sure if it's just an audit finding, could be more than that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
3 months ago
Sounds like a serious oversight to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
3 months ago
Wait, only 2 out of 15? That seems low for a department like IT.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
4 months ago
I agree, it shows a gap in training.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
4 months ago
That's definitely an audit finding.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
4 months ago
I definitely recall that audit findings point out issues, so I would go with option A for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards audit finding too, but could it also be considered an information source? I’m a bit confused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
4 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed audit evidence, but this feels more like a finding to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
5 months ago
I think this might be an audit finding since it highlights a gap in training, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
5 months ago
I'm confident the answer is A. Audit finding. The question is clearly describing a finding from the auditor's work, so that's the best fit among the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking what the information about the two employees who didn't receive training represents. Since it's directly related to the audit, the answer must be "Audit finding."
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to make sure I understand the difference between an audit finding, audit evidence, and information source. Let me think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward audit finding question. I'll carefully read through the options and think about what the information provided represents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. We need to ensure all the apps can access the resources in Vnet1 without going through the internet. I'm guessing the number of integration subnets has something to do with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
1 year ago
I'd say this is a classic case of 'security through obscurity' - out of sight, out of mind. Time to shine a light on that dark corner of the IT department!
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
1 year ago
C) Information source
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
1 year ago
B) Audit evidence
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
1 year ago
A) Audit finding
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reita
1 year ago
Haha, looks like those two employees need to watch some 'Cybersecurity for Dummies' videos ASAP!
upvoted 0 times
Iesha
1 year ago
C) Information source
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
1 year ago
B) Audit evidence
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
1 year ago
A) Audit finding
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Henriette
1 year ago
But could it also be considered audit evidence of a potential risk?
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
1 year ago
I agree with Latia, it shows a gap in training.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Couldn't this also be considered an information source for the auditor to further investigate the training processes?
upvoted 0 times
Arlette
1 year ago
It could be both an audit finding and an information source for further investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
1 year ago
C) Information source
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
1 year ago
B) Audit evidence
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
1 year ago
A) Audit finding
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chauncey
1 year ago
I agree, this is definitely audit evidence that the company needs to address their security training program.
upvoted 0 times
Tamar
1 year ago
C) Information source
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
1 year ago
B) Audit evidence
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
1 year ago
A) Audit finding
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Flo
1 year ago
This seems like a clear-cut audit finding to me. Two out of 15 employees lacking proper training is definitely a red flag.
upvoted 0 times
Malcolm
1 year ago
Yes, it's important to address this issue as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
1 year ago
I agree, it's definitely an audit finding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
1 year ago
C) Information source
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
1 year ago
B) Audit evidence
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
1 year ago
A) Audit finding
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latia
1 year ago
I think it's an audit finding.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel