Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam - Topic 4 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 4
[All ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions]

The auditor discovered that two out of 15 employees of the IT Department have not received adequate information security training. What does this represent?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

This scenario represents an 'audit finding.' An audit finding refers to results that indicate a deviation from the expected performance or standards. Discovering that two employees have not received the required training is an audit finding indicating noncompliance with the organization's training requirements.


by Armando at Sep 14, 2024, 08:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lanie
6 months ago
Not sure if it's just an audit finding, could be more than that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
6 months ago
Sounds like a serious oversight to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
6 months ago
Wait, only 2 out of 15? That seems low for a department like IT.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
7 months ago
I agree, it shows a gap in training.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
7 months ago
That's definitely an audit finding.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
7 months ago
I definitely recall that audit findings point out issues, so I would go with option A for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards audit finding too, but could it also be considered an information source? I’m a bit confused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
7 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed audit evidence, but this feels more like a finding to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
8 months ago
I think this might be an audit finding since it highlights a gap in training, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
8 months ago
I'm confident the answer is A. Audit finding. The question is clearly describing a finding from the auditor's work, so that's the best fit among the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking what the information about the two employees who didn't receive training represents. Since it's directly related to the audit, the answer must be "Audit finding."
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I need to make sure I understand the difference between an audit finding, audit evidence, and information source. Let me think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward audit finding question. I'll carefully read through the options and think about what the information provided represents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. We need to ensure all the apps can access the resources in Vnet1 without going through the internet. I'm guessing the number of integration subnets has something to do with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
2 years ago
I'd say this is a classic case of 'security through obscurity' - out of sight, out of mind. Time to shine a light on that dark corner of the IT department!
upvoted 0 times
Ciara
2 years ago
C) Information source
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
2 years ago
B) Audit evidence
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
2 years ago
A) Audit finding
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reita
2 years ago
Haha, looks like those two employees need to watch some 'Cybersecurity for Dummies' videos ASAP!
upvoted 0 times
Iesha
2 years ago
C) Information source
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
2 years ago
B) Audit evidence
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
2 years ago
A) Audit finding
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Henriette
2 years ago
But could it also be considered audit evidence of a potential risk?
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
2 years ago
I agree with Latia, it shows a gap in training.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Couldn't this also be considered an information source for the auditor to further investigate the training processes?
upvoted 0 times
Arlette
2 years ago
It could be both an audit finding and an information source for further investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
2 years ago
C) Information source
upvoted 0 times
...
Desirae
2 years ago
B) Audit evidence
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
2 years ago
A) Audit finding
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chauncey
2 years ago
I agree, this is definitely audit evidence that the company needs to address their security training program.
upvoted 0 times
Tamar
2 years ago
C) Information source
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
2 years ago
B) Audit evidence
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
2 years ago
A) Audit finding
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Flo
2 years ago
This seems like a clear-cut audit finding to me. Two out of 15 employees lacking proper training is definitely a red flag.
upvoted 0 times
Malcolm
2 years ago
Yes, it's important to address this issue as soon as possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
2 years ago
I agree, it's definitely an audit finding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
2 years ago
C) Information source
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
2 years ago
B) Audit evidence
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
2 years ago
A) Audit finding
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latia
2 years ago
I think it's an audit finding.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel