Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

PECB Exam ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer Topic 2 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 2
[All ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer Questions]

Scenario:

Headquartered in Sri Lanka, Operons Inc. is a freight forwarding company that adopted a BCMS aligned with ISO 22301. Prior to the certification audit, Operons Inc. measured gaps between their BCMS and the standard's requirements to ensure compliance. The certification body was contracted to conduct the audit, and a biased auditor from a previous ISO 9001 audit was replaced upon request. During the audit, two minor nonconformities were identified, and the audit team issued a recommendation for certification.

In Scenario 8, the certification body accepts Operons Inc.'s rejection of the auditor and appoints another one. Is this acceptable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Garry at Jan 12, 2025, 09:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISO-22301-Lead-Implementer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jacob
2 months ago
B, absolutely. You can't have an auditor with a history of unprofessional behavior. It's like asking a fox to guard the henhouse. Nope, nope, nope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
2 months ago
This one's a no-brainer. The correct answer is C. If the auditor's been in the company before, it's only fair to bring in a new set of eyes. Although, I have to say, I'm more worried about the biased auditor than the two minor nonconformities. Sounds like a spicy situation!
upvoted 0 times
Augustine
18 days ago
B) Yes, previously displayed unprofessional conduct is a valid reason to replace an auditor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
19 days ago
I agree, it's important to have a fresh perspective during audits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
26 days ago
A) No, the auditor can be rejected only if a conflict of interest situation is present.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
28 days ago
C) Yes, the auditor has previously audited the company against ISO 9001, which is a valid reason for replacing the auditor.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Izetta
3 months ago
That's a good point, but I still believe the reason for rejection should be based on a conflict of interest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
3 months ago
I disagree, if the auditor displayed unprofessional conduct before, it's valid to replace them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
3 months ago
I think it's not acceptable to reject the auditor just because of a previous audit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
3 months ago
I'm going with B. Unprofessional conduct is a big no-no, and the company has every right to request a replacement. It's like the old saying goes: 'Once a bad auditor, always a bad auditor.'
upvoted 0 times
Dean
2 months ago
B) Yes, previously displayed unprofessional conduct is a valid reason to replace an auditor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
2 months ago
A) No, the auditor can be rejected only if a conflict of interest situation is present.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
2 months ago
B) Yes, previously displayed unprofessional conduct is a valid reason to replace an auditor.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Novella
3 months ago
C seems like the obvious choice here. If the auditor has already audited the company against ISO 9001, that's definitely a valid reason to replace them. Gotta keep things fresh, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Micheline
3 months ago
Yes, the auditor has previously audited the company against ISO 9001, which is a valid reason for replacing the auditor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
3 months ago
C seems like the obvious choice here. If the auditor has already audited the company against ISO 9001, that's definitely a valid reason to replace them. Gotta keep things fresh, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosendo
3 months ago
Hmm, I think the correct answer is B. The auditor's previous unprofessional conduct is a valid reason to replace them, even if there's no direct conflict of interest. Can't have biased auditors, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Phung
3 months ago
C) Yes, the auditor has previously audited the company against ISO 9001, which is a valid reason for replacing the auditor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eulah
3 months ago
B) Yes, previously displayed unprofessional conduct is a valid reason to replace an auditor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
3 months ago
A) No, the auditor can be rejected only if a conflict of interest situation is present.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel