New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

PECB ISO 22301 Lead Implementer Exam - Topic 2 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for PECB's ISO 22301 Lead Implementer exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 2
[All ISO 22301 Lead Implementer Questions]

Scenario:

Prebank is a multinational financial institution. Its services include banking and investing through banking centers, ATMs, and mobile banking platforms. With millions of clients, Prebank's database systems record vast amounts of data and transactions daily. Its main activities depend on the ability of its employees to access clients' data through its database system at any time.

Recently, Prebank's database system stopped working unexpectedly. Soon after, it was discovered that this disruption was caused by the maintenance work on the road outside the company's office building. During the road repair, the workers had unintentionally damaged a water pipe that leaked into Prebank's basement. This leakage affected the company's electrical infrastructure, resulting in a loss of power, which shut down equipment and computers in the server room. Consequently, employees were unable to access Prebank's database system.

After this incident, the employees immediately notified Prebank's IT team. Subsequently, the IT team informed both the maintenance company responsible for the roadworks and the insurance company. The company responsible for maintenance told Prebank's IT team that the maintenance team was not available for the day. Since Prebank did not have a plan for responding to similar disruptions, they had to stop working and go home. Thankfully, the maintenance team arrived at the scene on the next day and made all the necessary repairs, allowing Prebank to resume all its operations.

Following these events, Prebank decided to change its strategy and procedures to prioritize business continuity planning within the company. Its main focus was to address the root cause of disruptions to improve business continuity. As such, the top management decided to implement a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS) based on ISO 22301.

After setting the company's business continuity objectives, the company established a project team, including a project manager and four additional team members. The BCM team was responsible for managing the BCMS implementation process, whereas the top management was responsible for the effectiveness of the BCMS. Through analyzing potential risk scenarios, the team defined Prebank's business continuity strategy as well as the resources for supporting business continuity within the company. This enabled the team to predict the impact of disruptions caused by various incidents, such as power outages. Following these actions, the company established a business continuity plan to manage disruptions effectively without impacting the workflow.

The effective implementation of the BCMS helped Prebank not only minimize losses and ensure continuity in its services but also absorb and adapt to a changing environment.

What type of hazard caused Prebank's database system to stop working?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lorita
2 months ago
Good call on the BCMS. They needed a better plan for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
2 months ago
Accidents and technological hazard seems right. It was a chain reaction!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
2 months ago
Surprised it took them so long to fix it. What were they thinking?
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
3 months ago
I think it's more of a human-caused hazard. Someone messed up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
3 months ago
Definitely an environmental hazard. Water damage is no joke!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
3 months ago
I feel like it’s a mix of accidents and technological hazards since the water pipe burst was an accident, but it affected the tech systems directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
3 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question we did about technological hazards. I wonder if this fits that category too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but it could also be considered a human-caused hazard because the maintenance work led to the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
4 months ago
I think the hazard was an environmental one since it involved water damage from the pipe leak.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
4 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm leaning towards option C as well. The scenario describes a chain of events starting with the road work, which suggests an accident or technological issue rather than a pure environmental hazard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
4 months ago
I think the key here is that the water pipe leak was the root cause, even though it was triggered by the road maintenance work. So I'm going to go with option C, accidents and technological hazard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
4 months ago
Okay, let's break this down. The road maintenance work caused the water pipe leak, which then led to the power outage and database system failure. So I'd say this is an accident or technological hazard, not purely environmental.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions both environmental and technological factors, so I'll need to think carefully about which one was the primary cause of the disruption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. The scenario clearly describes an environmental hazard - the water pipe leak that caused the power outage and disrupted the database system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
10 months ago
I wonder if the maintenance team was taking their cues from the water-walking guy in the Bible. A little divine intervention could have saved Prebank a lot of trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
10 months ago
You know, if I worked at Prebank, I'd be pushing for the company to invest in some waterproof server rooms. Might be a good insurance policy against future 'acts of nature.'
upvoted 0 times
Samuel
8 months ago
It's important for companies like Prebank to consider all possible risks and take preventive measures to ensure business continuity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
9 months ago
I agree, investing in waterproof server rooms would be a smart move to protect the database system from environmental hazards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
9 months ago
That's a good point! Having waterproof server rooms could definitely prevent similar incidents in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thea
10 months ago
Hmm, the road repair crew really dropped the ball on this one. Hopefully, Prebank's new BCMS will prevent such 'accidents' from disrupting their operations in the future.
upvoted 0 times
Sharita
9 months ago
Good thing Prebank now has a plan in place to prevent such incidents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
9 months ago
Yeah, they really messed up by damaging the water pipe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
9 months ago
The road repair crew caused a lot of trouble for Prebank.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Larae
10 months ago
Yes, it was definitely a human-caused hazard. The workers unintentionally damaged a water pipe during maintenance work, leading to the disruption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
10 months ago
I agree, the environmental hazard caused by the water pipe damage is the clear answer here. Prebank should have had a better contingency plan in place.
upvoted 0 times
Arlen
9 months ago
Not exactly, the accident of damaging the water pipe was the main cause of the disruption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
9 months ago
C) Accidents and technological hazard
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
9 months ago
No, it was not a human error that directly caused the database system to stop working.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
9 months ago
B) Human-caused hazard
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
9 months ago
Yes, the water pipe damage caused by the maintenance work outside the building led to the electrical infrastructure failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
9 months ago
A) Environmental hazard
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosina
10 months ago
I agree with you. The disruption was caused by the maintenance work on the road outside the company's office building, which was done by humans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
10 months ago
Seems like a straightforward question. The water pipe leak and resulting power loss definitely point to an environmental hazard.
upvoted 0 times
Ria
8 months ago
That's true, the root cause was the environmental hazard of the water leak affecting the electrical infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
8 months ago
A) Environmental hazard
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
8 months ago
It was actually the maintenance workers who unintentionally damaged the water pipe, so it could be considered a human-caused hazard as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
8 months ago
B) Human-caused hazard
upvoted 0 times
...
Makeda
9 months ago
Yes, the water pipe leak caused by the maintenance work outside the building led to the power loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
9 months ago
A) Environmental hazard
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Son
10 months ago
I think the hazard that caused Prebank's database system to stop working was a human-caused hazard.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel