Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Palo Alto Networks XSOAR-Engineer Exam - Topic 3 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's XSOAR-Engineer exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 3
[All XSOAR-Engineer Questions]

An engineer would like to change an incident's SLA according to the severity field changes. How can the engineer achieve this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Von at Dec 23, 2025, 06:08 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium XSOAR-Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lashawn
3 days ago
B) is just for display, not for changing SLAs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
9 days ago
Wait, can you really automate that with a trigger script?
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
14 days ago
Changing the SLA manually? That's a hassle!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
19 days ago
I disagree, C) sounds more efficient for tracking changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
24 days ago
A) Use a field trigger script is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
29 days ago
A field display script? Really? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
2 months ago
Haha, option D is like the IT version of doing your taxes by hand. No thanks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
2 months ago
D is the easiest option, but definitely not the best. Who wants to do manual work every time?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
2 months ago
C is the most efficient solution. Automating the process with a scheduled job is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
2 months ago
I definitely remember discussing field triggers, so A seems like a strong option, but I wonder if there are any exceptions we need to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
2 months ago
I feel like D is too manual for this scenario, but I can't recall if B is really relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
3 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to automate SLA changes, and I think it was about creating a job that queries for changes. So maybe C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
3 months ago
I think it might be A, using a field trigger script, but I'm not entirely sure how that works in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
3 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. A field display script seems like it could work, but I think a job that automatically updates the SLA based on severity changes would be the most robust and reliable solution. I'm going to go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
3 months ago
Option D is definitely not the way to go - manually changing the SLA every time would be way too much work. I'm leaning towards either A or C, but I'll need to review the details of each approach to decide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I was thinking maybe a field trigger script could work, but I'm not 100% sure if that would be the best solution. I'll have to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
3 months ago
I think option C is the way to go here. Creating a job to query for severity changes and update the SLA automatically seems like the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
4 months ago
Option A is the way to go. Field triggers are perfect for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
4 months ago
I agree with A. It automates the process effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
4 months ago
I think A is the best option. Field trigger scripts are powerful.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel