Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Palo Alto Networks CloudSec-Pro Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Which two statements apply to the Defender type Container Defender - Linux?
A) It is implemented as runtime protection in the userspace. and C) It is deployed as a container.
B) It is deployed as a service.
D) It is incapable of filesystem runtime defense.

Palo Alto Networks CloudSec-Pro Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Palo Alto Networks's CloudSec-Pro exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All CloudSec-Pro Questions]

Which two statements apply to the Defender type Container Defender - Linux?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

The Defender type 'Container Defender - Linux' in Prisma Cloud is typically deployed as a container. This deployment method allows the Defender to integrate seamlessly into containerized environments, providing runtime protection and monitoring for container activities. By running as a container, the Container Defender can leverage the native capabilities of the container orchestration platform, such as Kubernetes, to provide security features like threat detection, vulnerability management, and compliance enforcement within the containerized environment. This approach ensures that the security protections are closely aligned with the dynamic and scalable nature of containerized applications.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
My
14 hours ago
I’m not sure about D. It seems wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
6 days ago
I agree, A and B make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
11 days ago
I think A and B are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
16 days ago
D is a no-go. It should have filesystem defense capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
21 days ago
I feel like C is definitely right. It's a container, after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
26 days ago
I agree, A and B make sense too. Services are essential.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 month ago
I think A and C are correct. Userspace protection is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
1 month ago
D is definitely wrong. It has filesystem defense capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 month ago
I feel like C could be right, but not sure about A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
2 months ago
I agree with Izetta. B makes sense too, it's a service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 months ago
I think A and B are correct. Userspace protection is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
2 months ago
Agreed, it’s all about runtime protection in userspace!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
2 months ago
Wait, it can't do filesystem defense? That sounds wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
4 months ago
A is definitely true, but D seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
I think it’s also a service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
4 months ago
It's deployed as a container, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
4 months ago
I agree, A and C are the correct ones!
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
4 months ago
Wait, it can't do filesystem defense? That sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
4 months ago
Definitely runtime protection in userspace!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
5 months ago
I thought it was a service, not just a container.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
5 months ago
It's deployed as a container, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
5 months ago
I feel like option B is definitely a possibility since many services are deployed that way, but I need to double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about option D; I thought Defender had some level of filesystem protection, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about container deployment, and I think option C might be correct since it's about containers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
5 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it's specifically for userspace.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel