Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Oracle 1Z0-588 Exam - Topic 1 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for Oracle's 1Z0-588 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 1
[All 1Z0-588 Questions]

Which filters can you apply to narrow the transaction history results when searching the transaction history?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

by Angelo at Nov 24, 2025, 05:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Z0-588 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leonor
5 hours ago
B is definitely needed for user-specific searches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
5 days ago
I thought you could only filter by dates, not node description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
10 days ago
Don't forget about the action description!
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
29 days ago
Wait, loss changes? Is that really a filter option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
1 month ago
Totally agree, user ID is super useful too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
1 month ago
You can filter by specific transaction ID!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
1 month ago
Haha, D is a good one! I'm going to try that next time just to see what happens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
2 months ago
The correct answer is A, B, C, E, and F. D is just silly - who needs to see lost transactions?
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
2 months ago
Definitely A, B, C, E, and F. I use those filters all the time to find what I need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
2 months ago
A, B, C, E, and F are the correct options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
2 months ago
I definitely remember Node Description being mentioned in a similar practice question, but I can't remember if it's actually applicable here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
2 months ago
I feel like Loss changes might be a trick option, since it seems less common compared to the others we studied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
3 months ago
I remember practicing with filters like From and To values, but I can't recall if Action Description is also a valid filter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
3 months ago
This is a good one. I think the most important things are being able to filter by user ID, transaction ID, and date range. The other options like action description and node description could be helpful too, depending on what I'm looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
3 months ago
Alright, time to put on my detective hat. The key filters seem to be the user ID, transaction ID, and date range. I'll start there and see if I can find what I need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
3 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know I can filter by user ID and transaction ID, but what are these "loss changes" they're asking about? I'll have to make sure I understand that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
3 months ago
I think A is useful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
3 months ago
I think we can filter by specific transaction ID and user ID, but I'm not sure about the Max Records number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
4 months ago
A, B, C, E, and F are the way to go. Gotta love those filters!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
4 months ago
Hmm, this looks tricky. I'll need to carefully read through all the options and think about which ones would be most useful for finding the specific transactions I need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
4 months ago
I think I can handle this one. The key is to focus on the filters that let me narrow down the transaction history results, like the specific user ID, transaction ID, and date range.
upvoted 0 times
Xochitl
4 months ago
I agree! Specific user ID is super helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel