OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Exam - Topic 6 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for OMG's OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 exam

Question #: 40
Topic #: 6

[All OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Questions]

Choose the correct answer:

Consider the following template Operation:

addElement (e : E)

Which Operation represents a binding of that template Operation?

AaddElement (e : Card)

BaddElement <e : Card>

CaddElement E -> Card (e : Card)

DaddElement bind E -> Card (e)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

The correct representation of a binding of the template operation addElement<E> with E being bound to the type Card is addElement (e : Card). This notation means that the template parameter E is being replaced by the concrete type Card, thus instantiating the template operation with that specific type. In UML, this instantiation does not require the bind keyword or the template brackets <> around the type in the operation signature itself; it is simply represented by using the concrete type as the type of the parameter in the operation. This usage is consistent with the UML 2.x Superstructure Specification, which explains how operations of a template classifier are instantiated when template parameters are bound to actual types.

by Rochell at Nov 20, 2025, 03:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium OMG-OCUP2-ADV300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Devorah

24 hours ago

D is confusing. I don't like the binding syntax there.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincent

6 days ago

C seems right to me. It defines the relationship well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefan

11 days ago

I feel like B is more accurate. It shows the type clearly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

16 days ago

Wait, are we sure about A? That seems too simple!

upvoted 0 times

...

Heike

22 days ago

D) addElement bind E -> Card (e) seems off to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rozella

27 days ago

C) addElement E -> Card (e : Card) is confusing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenna

2 months ago

I think B) addElement makes more sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carmelina

2 months ago

Haha, these options are like a bad joke. I'm glad I don't have to take this exam!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosendo

2 months ago

A is the obvious choice here. Specifying the type directly in the method call is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Moira

2 months ago

Option D seems a bit strange to me. Binding the template parameter like that doesn't seem right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margret

2 months ago

I think the answer is B. It looks like the correct way to bind the template parameter.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

2 months ago

I thought B looked correct at first, but now I'm questioning if it follows the right format for binding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Destiny

3 months ago

I feel like D could be the right choice since it mentions binding explicitly, but it looks a bit complex.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherron

3 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question where we had to bind types, but I can't recall the exact syntax.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johna

3 months ago

I think the answer might be A, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the correct way to bind the template.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louann

3 months ago

This is a tricky one. I'll need to take my time and really analyze each of the answer choices to make sure I select the correct binding representation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barbra

3 months ago

I'm pretty confident I know the right answer here. The template operation is clearly defined, so it's just a matter of selecting the proper binding syntax.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linn

3 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify the correct way to specify the type parameter binding in the method signature. Let me go through the options...

upvoted 0 times

...

Glenn

4 months ago

A) addElement (e : Card) is the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chandra

4 months ago

I think it's A. It looks straightforward.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bok

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the template syntax here. I'll need to review my notes on generics to make sure I understand the correct way to bind the type parameter.

upvoted 0 times

...