New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCP-US Exam - Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-US exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All NCP-US Questions]

A two-VM Oracle RAC cluster was recently configured with Linux Red Hat using a Nutanix Volume Group. At the time Of performing the failover tests Of simulating a failure in each Of the three Nutanix cluster nodes, the cluster administrator noticed that tile virtual machines Of the RAC cluster do not come up and the failover fails.

The administrator must to follow the best practices from Nutanix to construct the RAC cluster using AHV.

What should the administrator Veri'/ in the Steps performed to configure the RAC cluster to prevent this situation from occurring again?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

https://www.nutanix.com/architecture

Nutanix volume groupsare collections of vDisks that can be exposed to virtual machines or physical hosts using iSCSI protocol. Nutanix volume groups have a shared attribute that allows multiple VMs to access them concurrently.

In the step for attach the volume group to the RAC VMs, he must create it with an attribute of shared = true. This is because if the volume group is not created with shared = true, then only one VM can access it at a time, which would prevent Oracle RAC from working properly.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Vivienne
4 months ago
Wait, changing the disk timeout? That seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
4 months ago
Antiaffinity rules are definitely needed to avoid node conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
4 months ago
I’m not so sure about that, what if it causes other issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
4 months ago
Totally agree, that’s a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
4 months ago
Gotta set the volume group to shared = true for RAC VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
5 months ago
Option D seems like a good idea too, but I’m not clear on how VM-host affinity rules specifically apply to RAC setups. I might need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
5 months ago
I recall a practice question that mentioned disk timeout settings, so option C could be relevant. But changing it to 60 seconds seems a bit excessive, doesn’t it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the shared attribute in option A is important for the volume group. It might be related to how the VMs access the storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
5 months ago
I think option B about using Antiaffinity rules sounds familiar. I remember studying how those rules help prevent issues with VM placement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
5 months ago
This looks like a good opportunity to demonstrate my understanding of autofs and NFS. I'll make sure to double-check the permissions on the mounted directories to ensure the users have write access.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel