Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCP-MCI Exam - Topic 6 Question 15 Discussion

Posted by Page on Jul 14, 2024 at 07:47 AM

An administrator needs to limit the amount of storage space that data stored in single container can consume.

Which action should the administrator take?

Suggested Answer: C

The storage policy value that can be inherited from a cluster is Compression. In the Nutanix Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI) 6.5, compression is a storage optimization feature that can be configured at the cluster level and inherited by all the entities within the cluster. This feature helps in reducing the storage footprint by compressing the data before writing it to the disk. The other options like IO performance, Storage Container, and QoS are not inherited from the cluster. They are configured and managed separately for each entity as per the requirements.


Get Premium NCP-MCI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
DE
Denny 10 months ago
B is definitely the most straightforward option here.
KE
Keva 11 months ago
Wait, can you really limit storage with D? Sounds odd.
MA
Marg 11 months ago
A doesn't really limit storage, just rebuild capacity.
JO
Joanna 11 months ago
I disagree, C is better for managing snapshots.
LA
Lang 11 months ago
B is the way to go! Set that advertised capacity.
MA
Margery 11 months ago
I recall that storing VM snapshots separately can help with management, but it doesn't directly limit the container's storage. So, I don't think C is the answer.
LA
Lashaunda 12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage storage limits. I feel like enabling reservations could be relevant, but I'm leaning towards B as well.
MO
Mohammad 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about thick provisioning potentially wasting space. That might not be the right choice here.
BE
Beckie 1 year ago
I think the answer might be B, setting an advertised capacity for the container. It sounds like a way to limit storage.
AM
Amie 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Is the administrator trying to limit the storage space for the entire container, or just for the data stored within it? I want to make sure I understand the problem correctly before selecting an answer.
KE
Kenneth 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. If the goal is to limit the storage space in a single container, then setting an advertised capacity for the container (option B) seems like the most direct approach. I'll go with that.
RO
Roxane 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to be talking about different storage management techniques, but I'm not sure which one is the best fit for limiting the storage space in a single container.
RI
Rikki 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about managing storage capacity. I think I know the right approach, but I'll double-check the options to be sure.
DA
Danica 1 year ago
I think we need to use a constructor to set the properties, but I'm not entirely sure which option does that correctly.
KA
Kami 1 year ago
I think the APP Security dashboard might be the one to use for tracking high-risk traffic, but I'm not completely sure.
GW
Gwen 1 year ago
C) is a good idea, but doesn't really 'limit' the space in the original container, just moves the problem elsewhere.
SH
Sharita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gwen
C) Store VM snapshots in a different container
MY
Myra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gwen
B) Set an advertised capacity for the container
DE
Deane 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gwen
A) Enable reservation for rebuild capacity
LU
Luz 1 year ago
Haha, imagine an admin trying to 'rebuild' their way out of a storage problem. A) is a bit of a stretch.
SH
Sherron 1 year ago
I'm gonna go with B) because limiting the advertised capacity is a pretty straightforward way to cap the container's storage usage.
JU
Julieta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sherron
User 2: Yeah, that seems like the most direct way to limit storage usage in a container.
RO
Robt 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sherron
User 1: I think B) is the way to go, setting an advertised capacity makes sense.
AJ
Aja 1 year ago
I disagree. Storing VM snapshots in a different container would be a better option to limit storage space.
VA
Vashti 1 year ago
I agree with Glynda. Setting an advertised capacity will limit the storage space usage.
AN
Anthony 2 years ago
Thick provisioning the container in D) doesn't sound right, that's usually used to expand storage, not limit it.
JO
Joanna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Anthony
C) Store VM snapshots in a different container
SK
Skye 1 year ago
↳ replying to Anthony
B) Set an advertised capacity for the container
AL
Alyssa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Anthony
A) Enable reservation for rebuild capacity
JO
Johnson 2 years ago
B) Set an advertised capacity for the container seems like the most direct way to limit the storage space for a single container.
GL
Glynda 2 years ago
I think the administrator should set an advertised capacity for the container.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel