New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCP-MCI Exam - Topic 2 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCI exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 2
[All NCP-MCI Questions]

An administrator is responsible for resource planning and needs to plan for resiliency of a 10-node RF3 cluster. The cluster has 100TB of storage.

How should the administrator plan for capacity in the event of future failures?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

RF3 (Replication Factor 3) clusters require sufficient reserved capacity to tolerate failures without data loss.

Option C (Set Reserve Capacity for Failure to Auto Detect) is correct:

Auto Detect dynamically calculates the necessary reserved space based on cluster size and RF settings.

It ensures that enough storage remains available in case of a node failure.

Option A (Set Reserve Storage Capacity to 20%) is incorrect:

The required storage reservation depends on the number of nodes and RF level, not a fixed percentage.

Option B (Set Reserve Capacity for Failure to None) is incorrect:

Without reserved capacity, a node failure could lead to data unavailability.

Option D (Set Reserve Memory Capacity to 20%) is incorrect:

This setting applies to RAM, not storage resiliency.


Nutanix Bible Understanding Replication Factor (RF) and Failure Planning

Nutanix Prism Element Guide Configuring Reserve Capacity for Cluster Resiliency

Nutanix KB How to Plan Capacity for RF3 Clusters

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Roosevelt
6 hours ago
C) Auto Detect could lead to unexpected issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
5 days ago
I disagree, B) None seems risky for a 10-node setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
11 days ago
A) 20% reserve is a solid choice for future failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
16 days ago
C) Set Reserve Capacity for Failure to Auto Detect. The cluster needs to be able to handle failures without manual intervention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
21 days ago
B) Set Reserve Capacity for Failure to None. What could possibly go wrong? *laughs nervously*
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
26 days ago
D) Set Reserve Memory Capacity (%) to 20. Wait, this is about storage capacity, not memory. I think I need to review the question again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
1 month ago
A) Set Reserve Storage Capacity (%) to 20. This will provide a buffer for future growth and failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
1 month ago
C) Set Reserve Capacity for Failure to Auto Detect. This seems like the most logical choice to ensure the cluster remains resilient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
1 month ago
I feel like setting reserve capacity to none could lead to issues down the line, but I can't recall if we covered the implications of that in detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
2 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to choose between setting reserve capacity or auto-detect. I might lean towards option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
2 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having a reserve capacity for failures, but I'm not sure if 20% is the right amount.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
2 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'll go with option C, "Set Reserve Capacity for Failure to Auto Detect." That sounds like the best way to plan for future failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between "Reserve Storage Capacity (%)" and "Reserve Capacity for Failure." I'll need to review those concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
2 months ago
Alright, I've got a strategy. I'll need to look at the reserve capacity settings to ensure the cluster can handle potential failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
2 months ago
I think option A is the safest bet. 20% reserve sounds reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards C. Auto Detect seems smart for future issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
3 months ago
I vaguely remember something about memory capacity being less critical than storage capacity in these scenarios, so I’m not sure about option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
3 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is planning for future failures in the 10-node cluster. I'll need to consider the storage capacity and replication factor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
3 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel