Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nutanix Exam NCP-MCI Topic 2 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCI exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 2
[All NCP-MCI Questions]

An administrator is configuring data protection and DR for a multi-tier application. All VMs must be protected at the same time.

What must the administrator do to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The storage policy value that can be inherited from a cluster is Compression. In the Nutanix Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI) 6.5, compression is a storage optimization feature that can be configured at the cluster level and inherited by all the entities within the cluster. This feature helps in reducing the storage footprint by compressing the data before writing it to the disk. The other options like IO performance, Storage Container, and QoS are not inherited from the cluster. They are configured and managed separately for each entity as per the requirements.


by Willow at Jun 30, 2024, 12:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCP-MCI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Willodean
21 days ago
I don't know, guys. Option B might be the easiest, but what if one of those VMs is a real diva and decides it doesn't want to play nice with the others? Talk about a consistency nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
22 days ago
I think Option B is the clear winner here. Why bother with all the extra work of individual consistency groups or protection domains when you can just group them all together?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
24 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A seems pretty straightforward, but I wonder if it might be a bit of a hassle to manage all those individual consistency groups.
upvoted 0 times
Yuki
11 hours ago
User 2: Maybe creating a protection domain for the application and selecting auto-protect related entities would be easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
16 days ago
User 1: I think option A could work, but managing all those consistency groups might be a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Moon
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Creating a protection domain and letting it auto-protect the related entities sounds like a more hands-off approach.
upvoted 0 times
Janet
16 days ago
I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to ensure all VMs are protected at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
1 months ago
Option C sounds like the best choice. Letting the protection domain handle everything automatically is convenient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maybelle
2 months ago
Option B sounds like the way to go. Protecting all the VMs in a consistency group seems like the easiest way to ensure they're all backed up together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicholle
2 months ago
I agree with Malinda, creating a protection domain for each VM with identical schedules might be too complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe creating a protection domain for the application and selecting auto-protect related entities would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
2 months ago
I think the administrator should create a consistency group for each VM with identical schedules.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel