MENU
An administrator is configuring data protection and DR for a multi-tier application. All VMs must be protected at the same time.
What must the administrator do to meet this requirement?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium NCP-MCI Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
The storage policy value that can be inherited from a cluster is Compression. In the Nutanix Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI) 6.5, compression is a storage optimization feature that can be configured at the cluster level and inherited by all the entities within the cluster. This feature helps in reducing the storage footprint by compressing the data before writing it to the disk. The other options like IO performance, Storage Container, and QoS are not inherited from the cluster. They are configured and managed separately for each entity as per the requirements.
33 comments · newest first
LO
Lorriane
10 months ago
Totally agree with B, it simplifies everything!
TA
Tanesha
11 months ago
Wait, can you really protect all VMs at once like that?
RO
Roxane
11 months ago
A seems too complicated for just VMs.
LE
Lelia
11 months ago
I think C might be better for managing related entities.
AL
Alyce
11 months ago
B is definitely the way to go for app consistency.
JO
Jolanda
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether we should focus on consistency groups or protection domains. I need to recall which one ensures all VMs are protected simultaneously.
DO
Dominque
12 months ago
I feel like creating a consistency group for each VM would be too complicated. I think option B sounds more efficient for the whole application.
AU
Audrie
12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about protection domains, and it seems like option C might be the right choice since it mentions auto-protect.
LA
Laurene
1 year ago
I think we need to create a consistency group for all the VMs together, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best approach.
AN
An
1 year ago
I'm not totally sure about the difference between the consistency group and protection domain options. I'll need to think this through carefully and maybe even refer to my notes to make sure I select the best answer.
BR
Brittani
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option B - creating a consistency group for the application and placing all the VMs in it. That seems like the most straightforward way to ensure the entire multi-tier app is protected together.
KA
Karrie
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The administrator needs to create a consistency group for the entire application and put all the VMs in it. That way, the backups will be consistent across the whole application.
KR
Kristine
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the difference between consistency groups and protection domains. I'll need to review those concepts before I can confidently choose the right answer.
JO
Jovita
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about data protection and disaster recovery for a multi-tier application. I think the key is to ensure all the VMs are protected at the same time, so I'll focus on the options that mention consistency groups or protection domains.
NO
Nobuko
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know corticosteroids have anti-inflammatory effects, but I'm not totally clear on all the specific actions. I'll have to think this through carefully.
SI
Sina
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the Act deals with children's online privacy, but I can't quite remember the specific age limit. I'll have to think this through carefully.
BR
Brandee
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to think it through carefully. The options seem a bit tricky.
WI
Willodean
1 year ago
I don't know, guys. Option B might be the easiest, but what if one of those VMs is a real diva and decides it doesn't want to play nice with the others? Talk about a consistency nightmare!
LO
Lonna
1 year ago
I think Option B is the clear winner here. Why bother with all the extra work of individual consistency groups or protection domains when you can just group them all together?
GL
Gladys
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A seems pretty straightforward, but I wonder if it might be a bit of a hassle to manage all those individual consistency groups.
WI
Willie
1 year ago
C) Create a protection domain for the application and select auto-protect related entities
LI
Lilli
1 year ago
B) Create a consistency group for the application and place all VMs in it
RO
Rozella
1 year ago
User 3: Option C does sound like a simpler solution for protecting all the VMs at the same time.
JE
Jessenia
1 year ago
A) Create a consistency group for each VM with identical schedules
YU
Yuki
1 year ago
User 2: Maybe creating a protection domain for the application and selecting auto-protect related entities would be easier.
MA
Margot
1 year ago
User 1: I think option A could work, but managing all those consistency groups might be a hassle.
MO
Moon
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Creating a protection domain and letting it auto-protect the related entities sounds like a more hands-off approach.
JA
Janet
1 year ago
I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to ensure all VMs are protected at the same time.
SA
Samuel
1 year ago
Option C sounds like the best choice. Letting the protection domain handle everything automatically is convenient.
MA
Maybelle
1 year ago
Option B sounds like the way to go. Protecting all the VMs in a consistency group seems like the easiest way to ensure they're all backed up together.
NI
Nicholle
2 years ago
I agree with Malinda, creating a protection domain for each VM with identical schedules might be too complex.
MA
Malinda
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe creating a protection domain for the application and selecting auto-protect related entities would be more efficient.
SH
Shannan
2 years ago
I think the administrator should create a consistency group for each VM with identical schedules.