Nutanix NCP-MCI Exam - Topic 2 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCI exam

Question #: 13
Topic #: 2

An administrator is configuring data protection and DR for a multi-tier application. All VMs must be protected at the same time.

What must the administrator do to meet this requirement?

ACreate a consistency group for each VM with identical schedules

BCreate a consistency group for the application and place all VMs in it

CCreate a protection domain for the application and select auto-protect related entities

DCreate a protection domain for each VM with identical schedules

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

The storage policy value that can be inherited from a cluster is Compression. In the Nutanix Multicloud Infrastructure (NCP-MCI) 6.5, compression is a storage optimization feature that can be configured at the cluster level and inherited by all the entities within the cluster. This feature helps in reducing the storage footprint by compressing the data before writing it to the disk. The other options like IO performance, Storage Container, and QoS are not inherited from the cluster. They are configured and managed separately for each entity as per the requirements.

by Willow at Jun 30, 2024, 12:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCP-MCI Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lorriane

6 months ago

Totally agree with B, it simplifies everything!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tanesha

6 months ago

Wait, can you really protect all VMs at once like that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxane

6 months ago

A seems too complicated for just VMs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lelia

7 months ago

I think C might be better for managing related entities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyce

7 months ago

B is definitely the way to go for app consistency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolanda

7 months ago

I'm a bit confused about whether we should focus on consistency groups or protection domains. I need to recall which one ensures all VMs are protected simultaneously.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominque

7 months ago

I feel like creating a consistency group for each VM would be too complicated. I think option B sounds more efficient for the whole application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audrie

7 months ago

I remember practicing a question about protection domains, and it seems like option C might be the right choice since it mentions auto-protect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurene

8 months ago

I think we need to create a consistency group for all the VMs together, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

An

8 months ago

I'm not totally sure about the difference between the consistency group and protection domain options. I'll need to think this through carefully and maybe even refer to my notes to make sure I select the best answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittani

8 months ago

I'm leaning towards option B - creating a consistency group for the application and placing all the VMs in it. That seems like the most straightforward way to ensure the entire multi-tier app is protected together.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karrie

8 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The administrator needs to create a consistency group for the entire application and put all the VMs in it. That way, the backups will be consistent across the whole application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristine

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the difference between consistency groups and protection domains. I'll need to review those concepts before I can confidently choose the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jovita

8 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about data protection and disaster recovery for a multi-tier application. I think the key is to ensure all the VMs are protected at the same time, so I'll focus on the options that mention consistency groups or protection domains.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nobuko

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know corticosteroids have anti-inflammatory effects, but I'm not totally clear on all the specific actions. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sina

8 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the Act deals with children's online privacy, but I can't quite remember the specific age limit. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandee

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to think it through carefully. The options seem a bit tricky.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willodean

1 year ago

I don't know, guys. Option B might be the easiest, but what if one of those VMs is a real diva and decides it doesn't want to play nice with the others? Talk about a consistency nightmare!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonna

1 year ago

I think Option B is the clear winner here. Why bother with all the extra work of individual consistency groups or protection domains when you can just group them all together?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A seems pretty straightforward, but I wonder if it might be a bit of a hassle to manage all those individual consistency groups.

upvoted 0 times

Willie

11 months ago

C) Create a protection domain for the application and select auto-protect related entities

upvoted 0 times

...

Lilli

12 months ago

B) Create a consistency group for the application and place all VMs in it

upvoted 0 times

...

Rozella

12 months ago

User 3: Option C does sound like a simpler solution for protecting all the VMs at the same time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jessenia

12 months ago

A) Create a consistency group for each VM with identical schedules

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuki

12 months ago

User 2: Maybe creating a protection domain for the application and selecting auto-protect related entities would be easier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margot

1 year ago

User 1: I think option A could work, but managing all those consistency groups might be a hassle.

upvoted 0 times

...

Moon

1 year ago

I'm leaning towards Option C. Creating a protection domain and letting it auto-protect the related entities sounds like a more hands-off approach.

upvoted 0 times

Janet

1 year ago

I agree, it seems like the most efficient way to ensure all VMs are protected at the same time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Samuel

1 year ago

Option C sounds like the best choice. Letting the protection domain handle everything automatically is convenient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maybelle

1 year ago

Option B sounds like the way to go. Protecting all the VMs in a consistency group seems like the easiest way to ensure they're all backed up together.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nicholle

1 year ago

I agree with Malinda, creating a protection domain for each VM with identical schedules might be too complex.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malinda

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe creating a protection domain for the application and selecting auto-protect related entities would be more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannan

1 year ago

I think the administrator should create a consistency group for each VM with identical schedules.

upvoted 0 times

...