New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCP-EUC Exam - Topic 6 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-EUC exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 6
[All NCP-EUC Questions]

A group of developers are migrating from physical computers to persistent virtual desktops.

What is the recommended migration path?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Colette
3 months ago
Wait, are we really converting physical to virtual? That’s a big leap!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
3 months ago
D seems unnecessary for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chery
3 months ago
C sounds risky, not sure about that approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
4 months ago
I think B could work too, but not ideal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
4 months ago
A is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that roaming profiles (option D) are useful, but I’m not sure how they fit into the migration path for virtual desktops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
4 months ago
I feel like option B could be a good choice for testing, but I’m not confident if non-persistent desktops are ideal for developers who need consistent environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
4 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think option C might be relevant because converting physical machines could help maintain user settings, but it could be complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
5 months ago
I think option A makes sense since deploying a base image can streamline the process, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best approach for all scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
5 months ago
I've got this one! The answer is clearly A. Deploying a base image and provisioning the required apps is the way to go for a smooth virtual desktop migration. Easy peasy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
5 months ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one. I'm torn between A and B. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each approach to determine the recommended migration path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
5 months ago
Alright, let's see here. I'm pretty sure the answer is A - deploying a base image and provisioning the required hosted applications. That seems like the most straightforward and manageable approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few options, but I'm not sure which one is the "recommended" path. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
5 months ago
This looks like a classic virtual desktop migration question. I think the key is to focus on the recommended approach, which is likely to be the most efficient and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
5 months ago
This is a lot of information to take in, but I think I can break it down. I'll focus on understanding the key issues and stakeholders first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
9 months ago
I'm going with A. It's the most straightforward and scalable approach. Plus, who wants to deal with the hassle of converting physical computers or roaming profiles? Just give me my base image and let's get this migration done!
upvoted 0 times
Genevive
8 months ago
C) I think converting physical computers to virtual desktops might be more complicated, I prefer the simplicity of deploying a base image.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
8 months ago
A) I agree, deploying a base image is definitely the way to go. It's efficient and saves time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
8 months ago
B) Deploy non-persistent desktops and install required applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
8 months ago
A) Deploy a base image and provision required hosted applications
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
10 months ago
Haha, B definitely sounds like the 'lazy' option. Just deploy non-persistent desktops and make the developers install everything themselves? I don't think that's gonna fly with the management team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
10 months ago
D? Converting the developers' profiles to roaming profiles? That sounds like it might cause more issues than it solves. I'm not sure that's the recommended path.
upvoted 0 times
Hyman
8 months ago
C) Convert the physical computers to virtual desktops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
8 months ago
B) Deploy non-persistent desktops and install required applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
9 months ago
A) Deploy a base image and provision required hosted applications
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tammy
10 months ago
C is an interesting option, but I'm not sure converting the physical computers to virtual desktops is the best approach. Wouldn't that just be a one-to-one migration?
upvoted 0 times
Veronica
9 months ago
A) Deploy a base image and provision required hosted applications
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
9 months ago
B) Deploy non-persistent desktops and install required applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
9 months ago
I agree, converting the physical computers to virtual desktops seems like a lot of work for just a one-to-one migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
10 months ago
C) Convert the physical computers to virtual desktops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
10 months ago
A) Deploy a base image and provision required hosted applications
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
10 months ago
B) Deploy non-persistent desktops and install required applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
10 months ago
A) Deploy a base image and provision required hosted applications
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilda
11 months ago
I think the recommended migration path is A. Deploying a base image and provisioning the required hosted applications seems like the most efficient and scalable approach.
upvoted 0 times
Gretchen
9 months ago
A) Deploy a base image and provision required hosted applications
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
9 months ago
C) Convert the physical computers to virtual desktops
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
9 months ago
A) Deploy a base image and provision required hosted applications
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glen
11 months ago
I think deploying non-persistent desktops and installing required applications (B) is the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe converting the physical computers to virtual desktops (C) is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
11 months ago
I think the recommended migration path is to deploy a base image and provision required hosted applications (A).
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel