I'm going with A. It's the most straightforward and scalable approach. Plus, who wants to deal with the hassle of converting physical computers or roaming profiles? Just give me my base image and let's get this migration done!
Haha, B definitely sounds like the 'lazy' option. Just deploy non-persistent desktops and make the developers install everything themselves? I don't think that's gonna fly with the management team.
D? Converting the developers' profiles to roaming profiles? That sounds like it might cause more issues than it solves. I'm not sure that's the recommended path.
C is an interesting option, but I'm not sure converting the physical computers to virtual desktops is the best approach. Wouldn't that just be a one-to-one migration?
I think the recommended migration path is A. Deploying a base image and provisioning the required hosted applications seems like the most efficient and scalable approach.
Mitsue
16 days agoViola
21 days agoMargot
23 days agoTammy
2 months agoKarol
9 days agoVirgina
15 days agoEric
23 days agoPeggie
28 days agoEmmanuel
1 months agoReena
1 months agoWilda
2 months agoGretchen
12 days agoJamie
15 days agoDenny
18 days agoGlen
2 months agoEvangelina
2 months agoVal
2 months ago