I'm going with A. It's the most straightforward and scalable approach. Plus, who wants to deal with the hassle of converting physical computers or roaming profiles? Just give me my base image and let's get this migration done!
Haha, B definitely sounds like the 'lazy' option. Just deploy non-persistent desktops and make the developers install everything themselves? I don't think that's gonna fly with the management team.
D? Converting the developers' profiles to roaming profiles? That sounds like it might cause more issues than it solves. I'm not sure that's the recommended path.
C is an interesting option, but I'm not sure converting the physical computers to virtual desktops is the best approach. Wouldn't that just be a one-to-one migration?
I think the recommended migration path is A. Deploying a base image and provisioning the required hosted applications seems like the most efficient and scalable approach.
Mitsue
2 months agoGenevive
20 days agoLili
21 days agoLeoma
1 months agoSabine
1 months agoViola
2 months agoMargot
2 months agoHyman
25 days agoTwana
26 days agoVincenza
1 months agoTammy
3 months agoVeronica
1 months agoKarol
2 months agoVirgina
2 months agoEric
2 months agoPeggie
2 months agoEmmanuel
3 months agoReena
3 months agoWilda
3 months agoGretchen
2 months agoJamie
2 months agoDenny
2 months agoGlen
3 months agoEvangelina
3 months agoVal
4 months ago