Nutanix NCP-EUC Exam - Topic 2 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-EUC exam

Question #: 31
Topic #: 2

A new client has just deployed a new Frame account, During the testing phase, the security team found that they had bidirectional clipboard, capabilities, the ability to transfer files, and connectivity to unauthorized external storage devices.

What should the administrator do to secure the environment, based on the security team's feedback?

AApply Group Policies to limit the end users abilities.

BImplement a Mobile Device Management solution.

CDisable unauthorized storage providers and features.

DDeploy a device visibility & control platform.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

Nutanix offers a solution that delivers virtual apps and desktops in one click. Nutanix supports both persistent and non-persistent VDI deployments, as well as RDSH-based VMs and AppStacks.

Storage containers are logical units that group vDisks and apply storage policies such as replication factor, encryption, compression, deduplication and erasure coding3.Nutanix recommends using compression and deduplication to reduce storage usage and avoid duplicate data4.

by Ngoc at Jul 06, 2024, 03:56 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NCP-EUC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Wava

3 months ago

Not sure if just disabling features is enough, we need a full strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodolfo

3 months ago

Group Policies might help, but I think C is more direct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andra

3 months ago

Wait, can they really transfer files like that? Sounds risky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nu

4 months ago

I agree, C seems like the best choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennifer

4 months ago

Definitely need to disable those unauthorized storage options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reuben

4 months ago

Deploying a device visibility & control platform sounds good, but I think we should focus on disabling those clipboard and file transfer features first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawny

4 months ago

I feel like implementing a Mobile Device Management solution is more about managing devices than securing the environment directly. Not sure if it fits here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think applying Group Policies could help limit user capabilities too. It might be worth considering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julieta

5 months ago

I remember we talked about disabling unauthorized storage providers in class. That seems like a key step to secure the environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felice

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident on this one. The security team has already identified the issues, so the solution is to disable those unauthorized capabilities. Option C is the clear choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Norah

5 months ago

This is a tricky one. There are a few different options, but I'm leaning towards implementing a Mobile Device Management solution (option B). That seems like it would give the most comprehensive control over the environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jillian

5 months ago

Okay, I think the key here is to focus on the security team's feedback. They identified some risky capabilities, so the best approach is to disable those unauthorized features and limit user access. Option C looks like the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tom

5 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions a "Frame account", which I'm not too familiar with. I might need to do some quick research on that before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems like a pretty straightforward security question. I'd probably go with option C - disabling the unauthorized storage and features to lock down the environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Michael

5 months ago

This question seems pretty straightforward. I think I've got a good handle on NetProfiler Host Groups and Types, so I'll give it a shot.

upvoted 0 times

...

Niesha

9 months ago

I'm sure the administrator will make the right choice, as long as they don't 'frame' it up too badly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nieves

10 months ago

I'm just glad I don't have to deal with this. I'll stick to my trusty pen and paper - no security breaches there!

upvoted 0 times

Gracie

8 months ago

D) Deploy a device visibility & control platform.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamera

8 months ago

C) Disable unauthorized storage providers and features.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivan

9 months ago

A) Apply Group Policies to limit the end users abilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hermila

10 months ago

Applying Group Policies to limit the end users' abilities is a good start, but I'm not sure it will fully address the security risks identified by the team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lanie

10 months ago

Implementing a Mobile Device Management solution seems like a more comprehensive approach to managing the client's devices and securing the environment.

upvoted 0 times

Gerry

9 months ago

B) Implement a Mobile Device Management solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luisa

9 months ago

D) Deploy a device visibility & control platform.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julian

9 months ago

C) Disable unauthorized storage providers and features.

upvoted 0 times

...

Refugia

11 months ago

The security team's findings are concerning. I think disabling the unauthorized features and storage providers would be the most direct way to secure the environment.

upvoted 0 times