Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix NCP-EUC Exam - Topic 2 Question 31 Discussion

Posted by Ngoc on Jul 06, 2024 at 03:56 AM

A new client has just deployed a new Frame account, During the testing phase, the security team found that they had bidirectional clipboard, capabilities, the ability to transfer files, and connectivity to unauthorized external storage devices.

What should the administrator do to secure the environment, based on the security team's feedback?

Suggested Answer: B

Nutanix offers a solution that delivers virtual apps and desktops in one click. Nutanix supports both persistent and non-persistent VDI deployments, as well as RDSH-based VMs and AppStacks.

Storage containers are logical units that group vDisks and apply storage policies such as replication factor, encryption, compression, deduplication and erasure coding3.Nutanix recommends using compression and deduplication to reduce storage usage and avoid duplicate data4.


Get Premium NCP-EUC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
WA
Wava 10 months ago
Not sure if just disabling features is enough, we need a full strategy.
RO
Rodolfo 11 months ago
Group Policies might help, but I think C is more direct.
AN
Andra 11 months ago
Wait, can they really transfer files like that? Sounds risky!
NU
Nu 11 months ago
I agree, C seems like the best choice here.
JE
Jennifer 11 months ago
Definitely need to disable those unauthorized storage options.
RE
Reuben 11 months ago
Deploying a device visibility & control platform sounds good, but I think we should focus on disabling those clipboard and file transfer features first.
TA
Tawny 12 months ago
I feel like implementing a Mobile Device Management solution is more about managing devices than securing the environment directly. Not sure if it fits here.
GA
Galen 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think applying Group Policies could help limit user capabilities too. It might be worth considering.
JU
Julieta 1 year ago
I remember we talked about disabling unauthorized storage providers in class. That seems like a key step to secure the environment.
FE
Felice 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident on this one. The security team has already identified the issues, so the solution is to disable those unauthorized capabilities. Option C is the clear choice here.
NO
Norah 1 year ago
This is a tricky one. There are a few different options, but I'm leaning towards implementing a Mobile Device Management solution (option B). That seems like it would give the most comprehensive control over the environment.
JI
Jillian 1 year ago
Okay, I think the key here is to focus on the security team's feedback. They identified some risky capabilities, so the best approach is to disable those unauthorized features and limit user access. Option C looks like the way to go.
TO
Tom 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions a "Frame account", which I'm not too familiar with. I might need to do some quick research on that before deciding.
BI
Billye 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a pretty straightforward security question. I'd probably go with option C - disabling the unauthorized storage and features to lock down the environment.
MI
Michael 1 year ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think I've got a good handle on NetProfiler Host Groups and Types, so I'll give it a shot.
NI
Niesha 1 year ago
I'm sure the administrator will make the right choice, as long as they don't 'frame' it up too badly.
NI
Nieves 1 year ago
I'm just glad I don't have to deal with this. I'll stick to my trusty pen and paper - no security breaches there!
GR
Gracie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nieves
D) Deploy a device visibility & control platform.
TA
Tamera 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nieves
C) Disable unauthorized storage providers and features.
IV
Ivan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Nieves
A) Apply Group Policies to limit the end users abilities.
HE
Hermila 1 year ago
Applying Group Policies to limit the end users' abilities is a good start, but I'm not sure it will fully address the security risks identified by the team.
LA
Lanie 1 year ago
Implementing a Mobile Device Management solution seems like a more comprehensive approach to managing the client's devices and securing the environment.
GE
Gerry 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lanie
B) Implement a Mobile Device Management solution.
LU
Luisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lanie
D) Deploy a device visibility & control platform.
JU
Julian 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lanie
C) Disable unauthorized storage providers and features.
RE
Refugia 2 years ago
The security team's findings are concerning. I think disabling the unauthorized features and storage providers would be the most direct way to secure the environment.
AN
Antonio 1 year ago
↳ replying to Refugia
D) Deploy a device visibility & control platform.
GL
Glory 1 year ago
↳ replying to Refugia
A) Apply Group Policies to limit the end users abilities.
KR
Kristel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Refugia
C) Disable unauthorized storage providers and features.
ME
Melynda 2 years ago
I think deploying a device visibility & control platform would also be a good idea.
SK
Skye 2 years ago
I agree with Kimberely, that would help secure the environment.
KI
Kimberely 2 years ago
I think we should disable unauthorized storage providers and features.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel