I feel confident that the answer is B. The whole point of SDN is to enable real-time, automated network optimization, so the traffic engineering would definitely be conducted on a much more granular timescale than yearly or quarterly.
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. SDN networks have a centralized controller that can dynamically adjust the network, so the traffic engineering is likely more frequent than in traditional networks. I'm leaning towards B, but I'll double-check my understanding before answering.
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I know SDN networks allow for more dynamic control, but I'm not sure if the traffic engineering is really done that frequently. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover a range of different artifact types, and I'm not entirely confident in my knowledge of the TOGAF framework. I'll need to think this through carefully.
I'm going with C. Who needs real-time traffic engineering when you can just run the simulations offline and call it a day? Less work for the poor network operators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Eric
3 months agoRaul
3 months agoDaisy
3 months agoSabine
4 months agoQuentin
4 months agoShenika
4 months agoSabine
4 months agoAdelina
4 months agoJuan
5 months agoLettie
5 months agoVal
5 months agoLacey
5 months agoShelba
5 months agoIsaac
5 months agoPedro
1 year agoTimmy
1 year agoFranchesca
1 year agoVincenza
1 year agoHollis
1 year agoTalia
1 year agoBeula
1 year agoFlo
1 year agoArdella
1 year agoErinn
1 year agoHector
1 year agoMari
1 year agoGary
1 year agoErasmo
1 year agoGraham
1 year ago