New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-114 Exam - Topic 8 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-114 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 8
[All 4A0-114 Questions]

Which of the following regarding BGP Path Identifier is FALSE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Georgene at Jul 01, 2024, 10:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-114 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Goldie
3 months ago
D is definitely correct, every speaker needs its own Path-ID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
3 months ago
Wait, I thought Path-ID was mandatory? This is confusing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
3 months ago
C sounds right, Path-ID does uniquely identify paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
4 months ago
I think B is the false one, it’s not always transitive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
4 months ago
A is true, Path-ID is indeed four octets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
4 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think option B might be the false statement since Path-ID is supposed to be mandatory in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
4 months ago
I feel like Path-ID uniquely identifies paths, but I’m confused about whether it’s generated by the speaker or just reused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
4 months ago
I remember something about Path-ID being an optional attribute, but I can't recall if it’s transitive or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
5 months ago
I think Path-ID is related to how BGP handles multiple paths, but I’m not sure if it’s always a four-octet identifier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
5 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it. The key is understanding how Path-ID works with BGP updates. Time to put my knowledge to the test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
5 months ago
I remember learning about Path-ID in class, but I'm drawing a blank on the details right now. Gotta focus!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I need to carefully consider each option and eliminate the false one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The Path-ID concept is a bit tricky for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
5 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident I know the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
5 months ago
Storing the results without overwriting previous builds is definitely important, so I'm leaning towards option A or C. The dashboard idea in A sounds really useful for the team to be able to access the results easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with DMVPN. I'll need to review the differences between the VPN options to make sure I pick the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
5 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Creating a hyperparameter tuning job and setting the accuracy as the objective metric sounds like the most straightforward and least effortful solution. It should handle the optimization process for us, which is exactly what we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
2 years ago
I'm drawing a blank on this one. Guess I need to brush up on my BGP path attributes.
upvoted 0 times
Aja
2 years ago
C) Path-ID uniquely identifies each path advertised to a neighbor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
2 years ago
B) Path-ID is an optional transitive attribute used to advertise multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
2 years ago
A) Path-ID is a four-octet identifier pre-pended to the NLRI field of a BGP update.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daniel
2 years ago
Hah, this question is a real path-ID-entity crisis!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
2 years ago
Option A is definitely true. Path-ID is a four-octet identifier prepended to the NLRI field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
2 years ago
I'm pretty sure option C is false. Path-ID doesn't uniquely identify each path, it just helps differentiate them.
upvoted 0 times
Leeann
1 year ago
D) A BGP speaker that re-advertises a route must generate its own Path-ID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
2 years ago
C) Path-ID uniquely identifies each path advertised to a neighbor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
2 years ago
B) Path-ID is an optional transitive attribute used to advertise multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
2 years ago
A) Path-ID is a four-octet identifier pre-pended to the NLRI field of a BGP update.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lili
2 years ago
D seems to be the correct answer. A BGP speaker that re-advertises a route must generate its own Path-ID.
upvoted 0 times
Peggie
1 year ago
Path-ID is indeed an optional transitive attribute used to advertise multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
2 years ago
That's true. Path-ID is used to uniquely identify each path advertised to a neighbor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
2 years ago
Yes, you are correct. A BGP speaker that re-advertises a route must generate its own Path-ID.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
2 years ago
Path-ID is indeed an optional transitive attribute used to advertise multiple paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
2 years ago
That's true. Path-ID is used to uniquely identify each path advertised to a neighbor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
2 years ago
Yes, you are correct. A BGP speaker that re-advertises a route must generate its own Path-ID.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
2 years ago
Actually, I think the false statement is B because Path-ID is not optional.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
2 years ago
I think option B is false. Path-ID is a mandatory attribute, not optional.
upvoted 0 times
Tora
2 years ago
Thanks for clarifying that. I understand now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
2 years ago
So, the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
2 years ago
Yes, Path-ID is mandatory for BGP updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
2 years ago
I agree with you, option B is indeed false. Path-ID is mandatory.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Estrella
2 years ago
I agree with Latrice, D seems incorrect to me as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the false statement is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 years ago
I think the false statement is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel