Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-108 Exam - Topic 5 Question 91 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.According to the PIM configuration on SR-3, can the receiver in the diagram receive multicast traffic from the source for group FF1E::1234? Assume all the other configurations are correct.
C) No. As the rp configuration is missing. There should be at least one RP selection method from static, bsr or embedded-rp
A) Yes. The configuration of PIM is correct and the receiver should get traffic from the source
B) No. As the 'rpf6-table' command is missing
D) No. As the 'no IPv6-multicast-disable' command is missing
E) B, C and D

Nokia 4A0-108 Exam - Topic 5 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-108 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 5
[All 4A0-108 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

According to the PIM configuration on SR-3, can the receiver in the diagram receive multicast traffic from the source for group FF1E::1234? Assume all the other configurations are correct.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Tien at Jun 30, 2024, 10:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-108 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tiera
6 months ago
So, E is the right choice then? B, C, and D all point to issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
6 months ago
Yeah, without 'no IPv6-multicast-disable', it won't function properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? I thought it could still work without those commands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nancey
7 months ago
I agree, missing RP config is a big issue too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
7 months ago
The 'rpf6-table' command is definitely needed for multicast.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
7 months ago
I feel like the 'no IPv6-multicast-disable' command could also be a factor, but I need to double-check my notes on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
7 months ago
I'm leaning towards option E because it seems like multiple configurations could be wrong, but I can't recall all the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
8 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where the RP configuration was missing, and it definitely caused problems for multicast traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
8 months ago
I remember something about the 'rpf6-table' command being crucial for multicast routing, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the only issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
8 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to make sure I understand all the PIM configuration requirements before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The configuration is missing the 'rpf6-table' command, so the receiver won't be able to get the multicast traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The configuration details seem important, but I'm not sure exactly what I'm looking for. I'll need to re-read the question and options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The key things I need to check are the RPF table, RP configuration, and whether IPv6 multicast is enabled on the interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
8 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the PIM configuration details on SR-3 to determine if the receiver can get the multicast traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
8 months ago
Okay, this seems straightforward. Skewed distributions happen when the data is coming from multiple sources that should be the same, but aren't. I'm pretty confident I can answer this correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
8 months ago
This question is testing our understanding of capacity calculation. I think the key is to identify the main components that go into determining rated or calculated capacity. Option B seems to capture those best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
8 months ago
Facilitation could work well too, focusing on supporting the staff through the change. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of the different options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is that the warehouse needs to be able to track and locate the physical products. That's probably the core requirement for a WMS. I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
1 year ago
You know, if the receiver can't get the multicast traffic, they could always try using a tin can and string instead. At least it would be more reliable than this config.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
1 year ago
Hold up, did they really forget the 'no IPv6-multicast-disable' command? Wow, that's like forgetting to put pants on before leaving the house.
upvoted 0 times
Aleisha
11 months ago
User 3: I can't believe they forgot the 'no IPv6-multicast-disable' command. It's like forgetting to put pants on before leaving the house.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
11 months ago
User 2: No. As the rp configuration is missing. There should be at least one RP selection method from static, bsr or embedded-rp
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
12 months ago
User 1: Yes. The configuration of PIM is correct and the receiver should get traffic from the source
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sabra
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm going to go with E, since the 'rpf6-table' command, RP configuration, and 'no IPv6-multicast-disable' command are all missing.
upvoted 0 times
Terrilyn
12 months ago
User 3: So, it's important to have all the necessary configurations in place for multicast to work properly
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Without those commands, the receiver won't get the multicast traffic
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
1 year ago
User 1: I think E is the correct option because those commands are missing
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Twanna
1 year ago
The question mentions that all other configurations are correct, so I'd say the answer is A. The PIM configuration on SR-3 looks good, and the receiver should get the multicast traffic from the source.
upvoted 0 times
Serita
12 months ago
Yes, the receiver should be able to receive multicast traffic from the source for group FF1E::1234.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
12 months ago
Those commands are not necessary for the receiver to receive multicast traffic in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
12 months ago
I agree, the PIM configuration on SR-3 seems to be in order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
1 year ago
But what about the missing commands mentioned in options B, C, and D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
1 year ago
A) Yes. The configuration of PIM is correct and the receiver should get traffic from the source
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
1 year ago
I agree, option A looks like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
1 year ago
I think the answer is A. The PIM configuration on SR-3 seems correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kaitlyn
1 year ago
I agree with Skye. Without the 'rp' configuration, the receiver won't be able to receive the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
1 year ago
I disagree. The 'rp' configuration is missing, so the receiver won't receive the multicast traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 year ago
According to the configuration, it seems like the PIM settings are incomplete. The 'rpf6-table' command is missing, and there's no RP selection method defined. I'm not sure if the receiver will get the multicast traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Larue
1 year ago
User 4: Looks like the configuration is incomplete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
1 year ago
User 3: And there's no RP selection method defined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, the 'rpf6-table' command is missing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
1 year ago
User 1: I think the receiver won't get the multicast traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jennie
1 year ago
I think the receiver can get the traffic from the source.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel