Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 2 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-103 exam

Question #: 111
Topic #: 2

[All 4A0-103 Questions]

Which of the following about RSVP-TE is FALSE?

AIt supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.

BIt supports CAC to prevent resource overbooking.

CIt supports LSPs with traffic engineering constraints.

DIt supports LSPs that follow the IGP best path.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Clare at May 06, 2025, 12:38 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-103 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Izetta

4 months ago

I thought it followed the best path too, but maybe I'm wrong?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashandra

4 months ago

CAC is definitely a thing in RSVP-TE, so B is true.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

4 months ago

Totally agree, D doesn't sound right.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reuben

5 months ago

I think D is the false one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorthy

5 months ago

Wait, are we sure about A? That seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaniqua

5 months ago

I feel like I saw something about RSVP-TE supporting LSPs that follow the best path, but I might be mixing it up with another protocol.

upvoted 0 times

...

Moira

5 months ago

The LSPs with traffic engineering constraints sounds familiar, but I can't recall if they follow the IGP best path or not.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenneth

5 months ago

I remember practicing a question about CAC in RSVP-TE, and I think it does prevent resource overbooking, so that one should be true.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reyes

6 months ago

I think RSVP-TE does support traffic protection, but I'm not sure about the IGP equal cost paths part.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glynda

6 months ago

Okay, I think the key here is remembering that RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering and not just following the IGP best path. That should help me eliminate the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sol

6 months ago

Wait, I thought RSVP-TE had CAC to prevent overbooking. Is that not the case? I'll need to double-check the details on that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryrose

6 months ago

I'm pretty confident that RSVP-TE doesn't use IGP equal cost paths for protection. That's one of the key differences from regular routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nana

6 months ago

Okay, let's see. I know RSVP-TE supports traffic engineering, but does it really follow the IGP best path? I'm not sure about that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alayna

7 months ago

Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between RSVP-TE and regular IGP routing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leatha

10 months ago

Haha, RSVP-TE? More like RSVP-'Terrible' if you ask me. Just kidding, it's an important protocol, but I'm still trying to wrap my head around it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dusti

10 months ago

I'm pretty sure all the options are true, except for D. RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering, not following the IGP best path.

upvoted 0 times

Talia

9 months ago

So, the correct answer is D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

9 months ago

Yeah, it doesn't support LSPs that follow the IGP best path.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andrew

9 months ago

I think option D is the false one then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

9 months ago

I think you're right, it doesn't support LSPs that follow the IGP best path.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dino

9 months ago

Yes, it definitely supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myra

10 months ago

I agree, RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cletus

10 months ago

I agree, RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Serita

10 months ago

I agree with Kenny, the correct answer is C) It supports LSPs with traffic engineering constraints.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenny

10 months ago

But RSVP-TE actually supports traffic engineering constraints, so I think the answer is C).

upvoted 0 times

...

Emilio

11 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is D) It supports LSPs that follow the IGP best path.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bethanie

11 months ago

B and C seem correct, but I'm not sure about A and D. Gotta study more on RSVP-TE!

upvoted 0 times

Thaddeus

10 months ago

User 3: I'm not sure about D, does RSVP-TE really support LSPs that follow the IGP best path?

upvoted 0 times

...

Refugia

10 months ago

User 2: I agree, A is definitely false. It's important to understand all the features of RSVP-TE.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fletcher

10 months ago

User 1: I think A is false, RSVP-TE doesn't support traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenny

11 months ago

I think the answer is A) It supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sunshine

11 months ago

Option A is definitely false. RSVP-TE supports traffic protection, but not using IGP equal cost paths.

upvoted 0 times

Nada

10 months ago

I believe option D is also true, RSVP-TE supports LSPs that follow the IGP best path.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katheryn

10 months ago

You're right, option C is true, RSVP-TE does support LSPs with traffic engineering constraints.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dion

11 months ago

I think option B is also false, RSVP-TE does support CAC.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dyan

11 months ago

I agree, option A is definitely false.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanna

12 months ago

I think option D is false. RSVP-TE doesn't follow the IGP best path, it supports traffic engineering constraints.

upvoted 0 times

Levi

10 months ago

C) It supports LSPs with traffic engineering constraints.

upvoted 0 times

...

Armando

11 months ago

B) It supports CAC to prevent resource overbooking.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

11 months ago

A) It supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.

upvoted 0 times

...