Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 2 Question 111 Discussion

Which of the following about RSVP-TE is FALSE?
A) It supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
B) It supports CAC to prevent resource overbooking.
C) It supports LSPs with traffic engineering constraints.
D) It supports LSPs that follow the IGP best path.

Nokia 4A0-103 Exam - Topic 2 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-103 exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 2
[All 4A0-103 Questions]

Which of the following about RSVP-TE is FALSE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Clare at May 06, 2025, 12:38 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 4A0-103 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Izetta
5 months ago
I thought it followed the best path too, but maybe I'm wrong?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
6 months ago
CAC is definitely a thing in RSVP-TE, so B is true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
6 months ago
Totally agree, D doesn't sound right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
6 months ago
I think D is the false one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure about A? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
6 months ago
I feel like I saw something about RSVP-TE supporting LSPs that follow the best path, but I might be mixing it up with another protocol.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
7 months ago
The LSPs with traffic engineering constraints sounds familiar, but I can't recall if they follow the IGP best path or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
7 months ago
I remember practicing a question about CAC in RSVP-TE, and I think it does prevent resource overbooking, so that one should be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
7 months ago
I think RSVP-TE does support traffic protection, but I'm not sure about the IGP equal cost paths part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glynda
7 months ago
Okay, I think the key here is remembering that RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering and not just following the IGP best path. That should help me eliminate the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
7 months ago
Wait, I thought RSVP-TE had CAC to prevent overbooking. Is that not the case? I'll need to double-check the details on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident that RSVP-TE doesn't use IGP equal cost paths for protection. That's one of the key differences from regular routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know RSVP-TE supports traffic engineering, but does it really follow the IGP best path? I'm not sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
8 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between RSVP-TE and regular IGP routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
12 months ago
Haha, RSVP-TE? More like RSVP-'Terrible' if you ask me. Just kidding, it's an important protocol, but I'm still trying to wrap my head around it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
12 months ago
I'm pretty sure all the options are true, except for D. RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering, not following the IGP best path.
upvoted 0 times
Talia
10 months ago
So, the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
11 months ago
Yeah, it doesn't support LSPs that follow the IGP best path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
11 months ago
I think option D is the false one then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
11 months ago
I think you're right, it doesn't support LSPs that follow the IGP best path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dino
11 months ago
Yes, it definitely supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
11 months ago
I agree, RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
11 months ago
I agree, RSVP-TE is all about traffic engineering.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Serita
12 months ago
I agree with Kenny, the correct answer is C) It supports LSPs with traffic engineering constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
12 months ago
But RSVP-TE actually supports traffic engineering constraints, so I think the answer is C).
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) It supports LSPs that follow the IGP best path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
1 year ago
B and C seem correct, but I'm not sure about A and D. Gotta study more on RSVP-TE!
upvoted 0 times
Thaddeus
12 months ago
User 3: I'm not sure about D, does RSVP-TE really support LSPs that follow the IGP best path?
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
12 months ago
User 2: I agree, A is definitely false. It's important to understand all the features of RSVP-TE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
12 months ago
User 1: I think A is false, RSVP-TE doesn't support traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenny
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) It supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
1 year ago
Option A is definitely false. RSVP-TE supports traffic protection, but not using IGP equal cost paths.
upvoted 0 times
Nada
11 months ago
I believe option D is also true, RSVP-TE supports LSPs that follow the IGP best path.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katheryn
12 months ago
You're right, option C is true, RSVP-TE does support LSPs with traffic engineering constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
1 year ago
I think option B is also false, RSVP-TE does support CAC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
1 year ago
I agree, option A is definitely false.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joanna
1 year ago
I think option D is false. RSVP-TE doesn't follow the IGP best path, it supports traffic engineering constraints.
upvoted 0 times
Levi
12 months ago
C) It supports LSPs with traffic engineering constraints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
1 year ago
B) It supports CAC to prevent resource overbooking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
1 year ago
A) It supports traffic protection using IGP equal cost paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel