New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Netskope NSK300 Exam - Topic 6 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK300 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 6
[All NSK300 Questions]

A company wants to capture and maintain sensitive Pll data in a relational database to help their customers. There are many employees and contractors that need access to sensitive customer data to perform their duties The company wants to prevent the exfiltration of sensitive customer data by their employees and contractors.

In this scenario. what would satisfy this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Marsha
3 months ago
Regular expressions might not catch everything, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
3 months ago
Wait, are we really trusting machine learning with sensitive data?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
3 months ago
Fingerprinting seems too basic for this level of sensitivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
4 months ago
I disagree, machine learning could be more effective for detecting anomalies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
4 months ago
I think exact data match is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
4 months ago
Machine learning could help in detecting anomalies, but I feel like it might not be the most straightforward solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
4 months ago
Regular expressions seem useful for pattern matching, but I don't know if they really prevent data leaks like the question asks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
4 months ago
I think exact data match might be the best choice here since it can help identify sensitive data directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
5 months ago
I remember we discussed data protection methods, but I'm not sure which one specifically prevents exfiltration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
5 months ago
I've got a few ideas on how to tackle this. I'll start by considering the different data protection and monitoring approaches mentioned in the answer choices and see which one seems most relevant and effective for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key here is preventing data exfiltration, so I'm thinking the answer might involve some kind of data matching or detection technique. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and how they might apply to this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the details of the question and the answer choices to try to figure out the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
5 months ago
I remember learning about this in class. The business document data should be in the message header, and the supplementary messaging metadata should be in the message body. So I'll select True for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
5 months ago
I think the key here is figuring out where the soft preemption needs to be applied to solve the issue with the TE tunnels. I'll carefully consider each of the answer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
5 months ago
IaaS makes the most sense here. The customer handling the OS administration is a giveaway.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
2 years ago
Regular expression feels too simplistic. I think I'll go with 'B' too. Exact matching sounds like it directly addresses the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
2 years ago
True, but machine learning might be overcomplicating it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
2 years ago
Hmm, 'Machine learning' could also be a strong contender, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
2 years ago
Honestly, 'B) exact data match' seems most accurate for preventing data exfiltration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
2 years ago
Agreed. I'm leaning towards 'A' or 'B'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
2 years ago
This question is quite relevant, considering how crucial data protection is today.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel