Discuss Netskope NSK300 Exam Topic 6 Question 26

You built a number of DLP profiles for different sensitive data types. If a file contains any of this sensitive data, you want to take the most restrictive policy action but also create incident details for all matching profiles.

Which statement is correct in this scenario?

ACreate a Real-time Protection policy for each DLP profile; each matched profile will generate a unique DLP incident.

BCreate a Real-time Protection policy for each DLP profile; all matched profiles will show up in a single DLP incident

CCreate a single Real-time Protection policy and include all of the DLP profiles; each matched profile will generate a unique DLP incident

DCreate a single Real-time Protection policy and include all of the DLP profiles; all matched profiles will show up in a single DLP incident.

Suggested Answer: A

The appropriate rule type to use in the DLP profile for a document that is considered confidential when filled out is fingerprint classification. Fingerprinting is a method used to identify and protect sensitive data within documents. It works by creating a digital fingerprint of a file, which can then be used to detect any copies or derivatives of that file. In this case, fingerprinting would allow the hospital to differentiate between the blank patient form, which can be freely shared, and the same form with patient information filled out, which is confidential1.

Get Premium NSK300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

30 comments · newest first

Beckie 10 months ago

I thought all matched profiles would just show up together. Interesting!

Deandrea 11 months ago

Definitely going with option A. Separate incidents are clearer.

Daniela 11 months ago

Wait, can you really have multiple incidents for one file? Sounds complicated.

Arlette 11 months ago

Nah, I disagree. Option C makes more sense for unique incidents.

Stefania 11 months ago

I think option D is correct. One policy, one incident.

Patrick 12 months ago

I vaguely recall that having all profiles in one policy might lead to a single incident report, which sounds like option B or D.

Karrie 12 months ago

I feel like it could be option D since it mentions a single policy, but I'm not confident about how incidents are reported in that case.

Sharee 12 months ago

I remember discussing that if you want detailed tracking, you might need separate incidents for each profile. So, maybe option A or C?

Laurel 1 year ago

I think we practiced something similar in class, but I'm not entirely sure if multiple profiles create separate incidents or if they combine into one.

Gabriele 1 year ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review the DLP profile and Real-time Protection policy concepts again to make sure I'm understanding them correctly. Maybe I'll try to talk it through with a classmate before answering.

Sunshine 1 year ago

Okay, I've got this. The answer is C - create a single Real-time Protection policy and include all the DLP profiles. That way, each matched profile will generate a unique DLP incident, which is what the question is asking for.

Amie 1 year ago

Hmm, this seems tricky. I'll need to make sure I understand the difference between creating a single policy versus individual policies for each DLP profile. The wording about the "most restrictive policy action" and "all matching profiles" is also important to consider.

Glendora 1 year ago

I think the key here is understanding how the DLP profiles and Real-time Protection policies work together. I'll need to carefully read through the options to determine the correct approach.

Rodrigo 1 year ago

Wait, so we're supposed to choose the most restrictive policy that also creates the most incidents? Sounds like a real party trick! I'm going with the option that lets me juggle the most balls at once.

Delisa 1 year ago

Option B is the way to go. I don't want to deal with a bunch of separate incidents, that's just going to be a headache. A single incident with all the matches is the way to go.

Marshall 1 year ago

↳ replying to Delisa

That way, you can address all the sensitive data matches at once without getting overwhelmed.

Ernest 1 year ago

↳ replying to Delisa

It definitely makes things easier to handle when everything is consolidated into one incident.

Albina 1 year ago

↳ replying to Delisa

I agree, having all matched profiles show up in a single incident is much more manageable.

Natalya 1 year ago

Option D is the answer for me. Why create multiple policies when you can have everything in one place? Plus, a single incident is easier to manage and report on.

Felix 1 year ago

↳ replying to Natalya

It's definitely more efficient to have a single policy with all the DLP profiles included. Option D is the way to go.

Raymon 1 year ago

↳ replying to Natalya

I agree, having all the matched profiles in a single incident just makes everything more streamlined.

Shawnda 1 year ago

↳ replying to Natalya

Option D is definitely the way to go. It keeps everything organized and makes reporting simpler.

Katlyn 1 year ago

I'm leaning towards Option C. Having a single policy with all the DLP profiles seems more efficient, and the unique incidents will give me better visibility.

Loreen 1 year ago

↳ replying to Katlyn

It definitely seems like the most efficient way to handle sensitive data incidents.

Denae 1 year ago

↳ replying to Katlyn

I agree, having all the DLP profiles in one policy will streamline the process.

Dorothy 1 year ago

↳ replying to Katlyn

Option C sounds like the best choice. It will make managing incidents easier.

Ceola 1 year ago

Option A sounds like the way to go. I like the idea of creating a unique incident for each matched profile. It'll make it easier to track and investigate each incident separately.

Shannon 2 years ago

But having a single policy for all profiles might make it harder to track incidents.

Cristen 2 years ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is D.

Shannon 2 years ago

I think the correct statement is C.

Netskope NSK300 Exam - Topic 6 Question 26 Discussion