Netskope NSK300 Exam - Topic 6 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK300 exam

Question #: 26
Topic #: 6

You built a number of DLP profiles for different sensitive data types. If a file contains any of this sensitive data, you want to take the most restrictive policy action but also create incident details for all matching profiles.

Which statement is correct in this scenario?

ACreate a Real-time Protection policy for each DLP profile; each matched profile will generate a unique DLP incident.

BCreate a Real-time Protection policy for each DLP profile; all matched profiles will show up in a single DLP incident

CCreate a single Real-time Protection policy and include all of the DLP profiles; each matched profile will generate a unique DLP incident

DCreate a single Real-time Protection policy and include all of the DLP profiles; all matched profiles will show up in a single DLP incident.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

The appropriate rule type to use in the DLP profile for a document that is considered confidential when filled out is fingerprint classification. Fingerprinting is a method used to identify and protect sensitive data within documents. It works by creating a digital fingerprint of a file, which can then be used to detect any copies or derivatives of that file. In this case, fingerprinting would allow the hospital to differentiate between the blank patient form, which can be freely shared, and the same form with patient information filled out, which is confidential1.

by Mee at Jan 25, 2025, 09:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSK300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Beckie

3 months ago

I thought all matched profiles would just show up together. Interesting!

upvoted 0 times

...

Deandrea

3 months ago

Definitely going with option A. Separate incidents are clearer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daniela

3 months ago

Wait, can you really have multiple incidents for one file? Sounds complicated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

4 months ago

Nah, I disagree. Option C makes more sense for unique incidents.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

4 months ago

I think option D is correct. One policy, one incident.

upvoted 0 times

...

Patrick

4 months ago

I vaguely recall that having all profiles in one policy might lead to a single incident report, which sounds like option B or D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karrie

4 months ago

I feel like it could be option D since it mentions a single policy, but I'm not confident about how incidents are reported in that case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharee

4 months ago

I remember discussing that if you want detailed tracking, you might need separate incidents for each profile. So, maybe option A or C?

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

5 months ago

I think we practiced something similar in class, but I'm not entirely sure if multiple profiles create separate incidents or if they combine into one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gabriele

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review the DLP profile and Real-time Protection policy concepts again to make sure I'm understanding them correctly. Maybe I'll try to talk it through with a classmate before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sunshine

5 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The answer is C - create a single Real-time Protection policy and include all the DLP profiles. That way, each matched profile will generate a unique DLP incident, which is what the question is asking for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Amie

5 months ago

Hmm, this seems tricky. I'll need to make sure I understand the difference between creating a single policy versus individual policies for each DLP profile. The wording about the "most restrictive policy action" and "all matching profiles" is also important to consider.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

5 months ago

I think the key here is understanding how the DLP profiles and Real-time Protection policies work together. I'll need to carefully read through the options to determine the correct approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodrigo

9 months ago

Wait, so we're supposed to choose the most restrictive policy that also creates the most incidents? Sounds like a real party trick! I'm going with the option that lets me juggle the most balls at once.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

10 months ago

Option B is the way to go. I don't want to deal with a bunch of separate incidents, that's just going to be a headache. A single incident with all the matches is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Marshall

9 months ago

That way, you can address all the sensitive data matches at once without getting overwhelmed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernest

9 months ago

It definitely makes things easier to handle when everything is consolidated into one incident.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albina

9 months ago

I agree, having all matched profiles show up in a single incident is much more manageable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Natalya

10 months ago

Option D is the answer for me. Why create multiple policies when you can have everything in one place? Plus, a single incident is easier to manage and report on.

upvoted 0 times

Felix

8 months ago

It's definitely more efficient to have a single policy with all the DLP profiles included. Option D is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raymon

9 months ago

I agree, having all the matched profiles in a single incident just makes everything more streamlined.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnda

9 months ago

Option D is definitely the way to go. It keeps everything organized and makes reporting simpler.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katlyn

10 months ago

I'm leaning towards Option C. Having a single policy with all the DLP profiles seems more efficient, and the unique incidents will give me better visibility.

upvoted 0 times

Loreen

9 months ago

It definitely seems like the most efficient way to handle sensitive data incidents.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

9 months ago

I agree, having all the DLP profiles in one policy will streamline the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

10 months ago

Option C sounds like the best choice. It will make managing incidents easier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ceola

10 months ago

Option A sounds like the way to go. I like the idea of creating a unique incident for each matched profile. It'll make it easier to track and investigate each incident separately.

upvoted 0 times

...