Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp Exam NS0-593 Topic 7 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-593 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 7
[All NS0-593 Questions]

After users start reporting the Inability to create new flies in a CIFS share, you find EMS events for wafl.dir.size.max logged for the volume of the SVM to which the share points.

In this scenario, which action should you take to solve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

According to the NetApp Knowledge Base, adding a second NS224 shelf to an existing stack can cause the first shelf ID to change to the serial number if the cables are not connected properly1.This can also result in a Medium Impact error message: Shelves with both connections via the same SAS path detected2. This situation is not normal for a NetApp AFF A800 system and can affect performance and availability.The cables should be reconnected according to the SAS cabling rules and concepts for shelves with IOM12/IOM12B modules3and the controller-to-stack cabling worksheet template for quad-pathed connectivity4.Reference=Shelves with both connections via the same SAS path detected,Adding a second NS224 shelf, changes first shelf ID to the serial number,SAS cabling rules and concepts - shelves with IOM12/IOM12B modules,Controller-to-stack cabling worksheet template for quad-pathed connectivity.


by Kenneth at Jun 22, 2024, 01:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-593 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Bette
2 months ago
Hmm, I wonder if the users are just trying to store their entire music collection in the CIFS share. Maybe we should suggest they start a band instead of hoarding files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
2 months ago
Wait, we can actually increase the max file limit? I thought we were just supposed to yell at the users to stop creating so many files. This is a game-changer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
3 months ago
Increasing the maximum directory size seems like the way to go. I don't want to deal with the hassle of moving the volume or deleting all those files. Let's keep it simple!
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
1 months ago
D) Increase the maximum directory size for the volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
1 months ago
Increasing the maximum directory size seems like the way to go. I don't want to deal with the hassle of moving the volume or deleting all those files. Let's keep it simple!
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
2 months ago
C) Increase the maximum number of files for the volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
2 months ago
A) Delete unneeded files from the directory.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yesenia
4 months ago
Haha, looks like the users are hitting the file limit! Time to play the 'delete old files' game. But seriously, option C seems like the logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Una
3 months ago
C) Increase the maximum number of files for the volume.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
3 months ago
A) Delete unneeded files from the directory.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hillary
4 months ago
I would go with option C as well, it makes sense given the issue reported.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
4 months ago
I agree with Lashawnda, increasing the maximum number of files seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
4 months ago
I think we should increase the maximum number of files for the volume.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel