NetApp NS0-527 Exam - Topic 10 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-527 exam

Question #: 77
Topic #: 10

You are asked to implement a DR solution to protect employee home directories on the primary cluster. The solution should provide an PRO of one hour, disaster recovery and archiving configured on the same destination volume of the DR cluster. Your solution should also reduce the amount of secondary storage requirements and use lower network traffic on the WAN links.

In this scenario, which NetApp replication technology satisfies these requirements?

ASnapMirror-Sync

BSyncMirror

CMetroCluster

DSnapMirror

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Leatha at Aug 17, 2025, 02:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-527 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Karina

2 months ago

SnapMirror is definitely the way to go for reducing storage needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fanny

2 months ago

Wait, can SnapMirror really handle all those requirements?

upvoted 0 times

...

Boris

2 months ago

I'm pretty sure SnapMirror-Sync is the right choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

3 months ago

I disagree, SyncMirror might be better for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Odette

3 months ago

MetroCluster sounds like overkill for just home directories.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerlene

3 months ago

I'm leaning towards SnapMirror for its efficiency, but I need to double-check if it meets the one-hour RPO requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aimee

3 months ago

MetroCluster sounds familiar, but I don't recall it being specifically for DR solutions with low WAN traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tommy

4 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question, and I think SyncMirror could be a contender, but it might not handle the archiving as well as SnapMirror.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ming

4 months ago

I think SnapMirror-Sync might be the right choice since it offers real-time replication, but I'm not entirely sure about the archiving part.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anjelica

4 months ago

This is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards SnapMirror, but I want to make sure it can reduce the secondary storage requirements and network traffic as specified. I'll need to research the capabilities of each option more thoroughly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marya

4 months ago

I'm not too familiar with the different NetApp replication technologies, so I'll need to review the details of each option carefully. The key is to make sure the solution meets all the stated requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erinn

4 months ago

SnapMirror seems like the obvious choice to me. It's a well-established NetApp technology that can handle the disaster recovery and archiving requirements. I'm confident I can implement this solution correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selene

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the requirements. Does SnapMirror-Sync also meet the criteria for reduced secondary storage and lower network traffic? I'll need to double-check the capabilities of each option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

5 months ago

This looks like a pretty straightforward question. I think SnapMirror is the best option here since it provides the required RPO and can handle both disaster recovery and archiving on the same destination volume.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

5 months ago

I'm not too sure about this one. SnapMirror-Sync sounds like the closest match, but I'm worried about the network traffic on the WAN links. Maybe we should look into MetroCluster instead?

upvoted 0 times

...