Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-521 Exam - Topic 4 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-521 exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 4
[All NS0-521 Questions]

What Is modified when moving a LUN between different HA pairs in the same SVM to prevent loss of connectivity?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

When moving a LUN between different HA pairs in the same SVM to prevent loss of connectivity, the reporting nodes must be modified. The reporting nodes configuration ensures that the initiator paths are properly updated to reflect the new physical location of the LUN. This prevents disruptions in connectivity by maintaining the correct pathing information for the host systems accessing the LUN.

For more details, refer to:

NetApp Documentation on LUN Management


by Armanda at Nov 22, 2025, 02:55 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-521 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Barney
2 days ago
B) reporting nodes could be important too. They track the LUN's status.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
7 days ago
I'm leaning towards A) port name. Changing ports can affect connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
12 days ago
Reporting nodes might also play a role, but igroup is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
18 days ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems too simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
23 days ago
Agreed, igroup is the right answer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
28 days ago
I thought it was the LUN mapping?
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
2 months ago
It's definitely the igroup that gets modified.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
2 months ago
Wait, is this a real exam question? I thought we were just playing a game of "Guess the IT Jargon"!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is just trying to confuse us. As if anyone would think port name or igroup are the right answers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
2 months ago
C) igroup? What is this, a trick question? Igroups are for host access, not HA pair changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
2 months ago
D) LUN mapping is the obvious choice here. How else would you connect the LUN to the new HA pair?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
2 months ago
B) reporting nodes is the correct answer. Moving a LUN between HA pairs requires updating the reporting nodes to ensure the LUN is accessible from the new HA pair.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
3 months ago
I practiced a question like this where we had to ensure connectivity, and I think it was about reporting nodes, but I could be mixing it up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
3 months ago
I feel like the port name could be relevant too, but it seems like a less likely option compared to the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
3 months ago
I remember something about LUN mapping being important in similar questions, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure on this. My initial thought was that the igroup would need to be updated, since that controls which hosts can access the LUN. But now I'm second-guessing myself. I'll have to eliminate the other options and see which one makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
3 months ago
I'm pretty confident on this one. When you move a LUN between HA pairs, you need to update the reporting nodes so the new HA pair can access the LUN. That's the key thing that has to change to maintain connectivity. I'm going with B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
3 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. Since the LUN is being moved, the LUN mapping would need to be updated to point to the new HA pair. That seems like the most likely answer to prevent loss of connectivity. I'll go with D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
4 months ago
I agree, but isn't it also about C) igroup? They need to match.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
4 months ago
I think it's D) LUN mapping. It makes sense to keep connections stable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolann
4 months ago
I think we might need to modify the igroup when moving a LUN, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
4 months ago
A) port name? Really? That's just for the network interface, not the LUN itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
4 months ago
True, but if the igroup isn't updated, it could cause issues too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
5 months ago
Hmm, this one has me a bit stumped. I know HA pairs and SVMs are related to high availability, but I'm not totally clear on the specifics of how LUNs are managed in that context. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
5 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on what changes when moving a LUN between HA pairs. The options mention port name, reporting nodes, igroup, and LUN mapping, so I'll need to consider how each of those might be affected.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel