New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp NS0-194 Exam - Topic 5 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-194 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 5
[All NS0-194 Questions]

A customer is showing disk utilization is at 100% in Active IQ even though there are low protocol operations on the controller. You review the data shown in the exhibit.

In this situation, what should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lazaro
3 months ago
Wait, reseating a shelf module? Really? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
3 months ago
Definitely replace those disks, they look suspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
3 months ago
Not sure about that, could just be a reporting glitch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
4 months ago
I think adding disks is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
4 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of disk failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
4 months ago
Reseating the shelf module B sounds familiar, but I’m uncertain if that would actually resolve the 100% utilization issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
4 months ago
I feel like replacing specific disks could be a solution, but I can't recall if it was disk 6b.39 or another one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
4 months ago
This situation seems similar to a practice question where we had to decide between adding disks or replacing them. I think adding might help with utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
5 months ago
I remember something about checking disk health before making any replacements, but I'm not sure if that's the right first step here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
5 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I think I have a strategy for tackling this - I'll start by analyzing the disk utilization data and then consider the potential fixes based on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurene
5 months ago
Alright, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to weigh the options carefully and make sure I understand the implications of each before selecting the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key information seems to be the high disk utilization despite low protocol operations. I'll need to think through the possible causes and solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
5 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting one. I'll need to carefully review the data in the exhibit to determine the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
9 months ago
Option B is the clear winner here. Expanding the aggregate is the sane solution, unlike trying to fit more elephants into that tiny car.
upvoted 0 times
Thaddeus
8 months ago
User 4: Let's go with option B then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
8 months ago
User 3: It's the most logical solution in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
8 months ago
User 2: Agreed, adding disks to the aggregate will help bring down the utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
9 months ago
User 1: Option B is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Remedios
10 months ago
Disk utilization at 100%? Yikes, that's like trying to fit an elephant into a Smart car. Time to add some more storage space, my friend!
upvoted 0 times
Jina
9 months ago
Hopefully that will solve the issue with the high disk utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
9 months ago
Agreed, that should help bring down the disk utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
9 months ago
Let's go with option B and add more disks to the aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merlyn
10 months ago
I was thinking of replacing the disks, but the exhibit doesn't indicate any specific disk failures. B is the way to go here, gotta scale that storage up!
upvoted 0 times
Jess
9 months ago
User 3: I agree with Jess, scaling up the storage is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
9 months ago
User 2: Gerald, I disagree. We should add disks to the aggregate to bring down the average utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
9 months ago
User 1: I think we should replace disks 6b.34 and 6a.19.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivette
10 months ago
D sounds tempting, but resetting the shelf module is more of a troubleshooting step. We need to focus on expanding the storage capacity first.
upvoted 0 times
Patrick
8 months ago
D) Reseat shelf module B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
8 months ago
C) Replace disk 6b.39.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
9 months ago
B) Add disks to the aggregate to bring down the average utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
9 months ago
B) Add disks to the aggregate to bring down the average utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
10 months ago
A) Replace disks 6b.34 and 6a.19.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
10 months ago
A) Replace disks 6b.34 and 6a.19.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassie
11 months ago
I would go with option B and add disks to the aggregate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
11 months ago
I agree with Leah, replacing those disks might help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
11 months ago
I think we should replace disks 6b.34 and 6a.19.
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
11 months ago
The correct answer is B. Adding disks to the aggregate is the best way to bring down the high disk utilization in this case. I've seen this issue before and that usually does the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
9 months ago
D: Maybe reseating shelf module B could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
9 months ago
C: I would suggest replacing disk 6b.39.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisandra
9 months ago
B: I think adding disks to the aggregate might be a better solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
9 months ago
A: Have you tried replacing disks 6b.34 and 6a.19?
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel