Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-184 Exam - Topic 4 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-184 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 4
[All NS0-184 Questions]

You have a 2-node FAS8300 ONTAP 9.8 cluster that serves SMB shares. You are configuring interface groups for higher performance and resiliency.

Which two NetApp best practices should you follow to satisfy these performance and resiliency requirements? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Nu at Jan 23, 2024, 08:56 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-184 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Timmy
6 months ago
I thought using the same NICs was okay, but I guess not!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
6 months ago
Same chipsets can lead to issues, so D is a no-go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
7 months ago
Wait, are we sure about using different chipsets? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
7 months ago
I agree, option A is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
7 months ago
Definitely use ports from different NICs for better resiliency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
7 months ago
I recall something about using the same chipsets for consistency, but I’m not sure if that’s the best approach for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miriam
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between NICs and chipsets. I think using ports from different NICs is definitely a best practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
7 months ago
I’m a bit unsure about the chipset question. I think using different chipsets could help with performance, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
8 months ago
I remember we discussed using ports from different NICs for better resiliency. It makes sense to avoid a single point of failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to use ports from different NICs to maximize performance and resiliency. That way, if one NIC fails, the other can take over. I'm confident I can get this one right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know interface groups are important for redundancy, but I can't quite remember the specific best practices around using ports from different NICs versus the same NICs. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
8 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about configuring interface groups for performance and resiliency. I'll need to review the best practices for ONTAP interface groups to determine the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
8 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in my ONTAP training. The best practice is to use ports from different NICs with the same chipsets. That provides both performance and redundancy. I'll make sure to select those options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margo
8 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I think I know the most efficient search, but I'll double-check my work to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
8 months ago
This is a tricky one. The key seems to be balancing the need for a robust test automation framework with the flexibility required for the short product lifecycle and iterative development. I'm leaning towards option A - exploring more agile test automation tools that can keep up with the rapid changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
1 year ago
Wait, there's a wrong answer here? I was going to pick 'all of the above' and call it a day. Where's the fun in that?
upvoted 0 times
Candra
12 months ago
User1: Using ports from different NICs and chipsets provides better performance and resiliency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
1 year ago
User2: Why not B) Use ports from the same NICs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
1 year ago
User1: You should choose A) Use ports from different NICs and C) Use ports with different chipsets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carin
1 year ago
Easy peasy, A and D. Variety is the spice of life, or so they say. But I'll take my chances with matching chipsets, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
Ronald
12 months ago
User4: Variety is good, but I'll go with A and D for a balanced approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
1 year ago
User3: I think sticking with matching chipsets is the safer option, so D is a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
1 year ago
User2: Using ports from different NICs and same chipsets sounds like a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
1 year ago
User1: I agree, A and D are the way to go for performance and resiliency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Abel
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm thinking A and C. Might as well mix it up and let the chipsets duke it out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
1 year ago
I'm going with B and D. Who needs variety when you can keep it all in the same family?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
1 year ago
A and D are the correct answers. Gotta love that diversity in my NICs!
upvoted 0 times
Marica
1 year ago
D) Use ports with the same chipsets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
1 year ago
A) Use ports from different NICs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derrick
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely! Using ports from different NICs and with the same chipsets is key for performance and resiliency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
1 year ago
User 1: A and D are the correct answers. Gotta love that diversity in my NICs!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherell
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't using ports with the same chipsets be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 year ago
I agree with Lonna. Using ports from different NICs can provide resiliency as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
1 year ago
I think we should use ports from different NICs for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel