Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp NS0-163 Exam - Topic 8 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-163 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 8
[All NS0-163 Questions]

After configuring an ONTAP duster for SAN access, the administrator is notified that the cluster nodes are connected to separate fc switches.

Given the following output:

What action will correct the redundancy issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Ashleigh at Jan 26, 2025, 07:04 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-163 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tawna
6 months ago
Why would you swap at node-01 / la? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
6 months ago
Totally agree with A, that's standard practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure swapping cables is enough?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
7 months ago
I think B makes more sense, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
7 months ago
Looks like A is the right choice for redundancy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
7 months ago
I thought we had to focus on the identifiers when swapping cables, so maybe option A or C could be correct, but I'm not entirely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
7 months ago
I feel like option B might be the right choice since it mentions swapping cables at node-01 and node-02, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
7 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think it was similar to a practice question where we had to identify the correct cable connections for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
8 months ago
I remember something about ensuring redundancy in SAN configurations, but I'm not sure which cables to swap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
8 months ago
This seems straightforward. The nodes are connected to separate switches, so the solution is to swap the cables between the nodes to ensure redundancy. I'll go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maira
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the cable IDs in the output. I'll need to double-check my understanding of how the FC connections should be configured for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
8 months ago
Okay, based on the output, it seems the nodes are connected to separate FC switches. I think the answer might be to swap the cables between the nodes to ensure redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronica
8 months ago
Hmm, the question is asking about correcting a redundancy issue, so I'm guessing it has to do with the FC switch connections. Let me take a closer look at the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
8 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the output and think through the possible actions to restore redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
1 year ago
Wait, I've got it! The real solution is to just unplug all the cables and see which ones start sparking. *laughs* Nah, just kidding. Option B looks like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Vivan
11 months ago
User 4: Let's go with option B then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
11 months ago
User 3: I agree, that should correct the redundancy issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
11 months ago
User 2: Yeah, swapping cable at node-01 / lb with cable at node-02 / lb seems like the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
12 months ago
User 1: Option B looks like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devora
1 year ago
Alright, let's think this through. The diagram shows the nodes are connected to separate switches, so we need to create a redundant path. I'd go with option B - it seems like the most straightforward way to fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
1 year ago
Hold up, are we sure this isn't just a typo in the question? I mean, who names their ports 'Id' and 'lb'? Clearly, the real solution is to rename the ports to something more sensible. *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Omer
12 months ago
I see your point, but I think swapping the cables at node-01 / la with cable at node-01 / Id might actually solve the redundancy issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
12 months ago
I think swapping the cables at node-01 / Id with cable at node-02 / Id would be the correct action to take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
12 months ago
Yeah, I agree. 'Id' and 'lb' are definitely strange port names. Renaming them would make things a lot clearer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margurite
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Swapping the cables at node-01/lb and node-02/lb seems like it might just switch the problem, not fix it. Maybe option C is the way to go?
upvoted 0 times
Joni
12 months ago
Let's go ahead and try swapping the cables at node-01 / la and node-01 / ld to see if that resolves the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
12 months ago
I agree, that could be a good solution to fix the redundancy issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 year ago
I think option C could work, swapping the cables at node-01 / la and node-01 / ld might help.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawnda
1 year ago
Looks like we need to swap the cables on the nodes to create a redundant connection. I'd go with option B - that seems like the logical choice based on the diagram.
upvoted 0 times
Lacey
12 months ago
User1: Let's go ahead and swap those cables to correct the redundancy issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
1 year ago
User2: Yeah, swapping the cables at node-01 / lb and node-02 / lb makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 year ago
User1: I agree, option B seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mauricio
1 year ago
But if you look at the output, it clearly shows that the issue is with node-01 / Id and node-02 / Id. So, my answer makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe swapping cable at node-01 / lb with cable at node-02 / lb is the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
1 year ago
I think the correct action is to swap cable at node-01 / Id with cable at node-02 / Id.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel