Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

NetApp Exam NS0-163 Topic 8 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-163 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 8
[All NS0-163 Questions]

After configuring an ONTAP duster for SAN access, the administrator is notified that the cluster nodes are connected to separate fc switches.

Given the following output:

What action will correct the redundancy issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Ashleigh at Jan 26, 2025, 07:04 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NS0-163 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Corrinne
29 days ago
Wait, I've got it! The real solution is to just unplug all the cables and see which ones start sparking. *laughs* Nah, just kidding. Option B looks like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Gilbert
9 days ago
User 1: Option B looks like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devora
1 months ago
Alright, let's think this through. The diagram shows the nodes are connected to separate switches, so we need to create a redundant path. I'd go with option B - it seems like the most straightforward way to fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
1 months ago
Hold up, are we sure this isn't just a typo in the question? I mean, who names their ports 'Id' and 'lb'? Clearly, the real solution is to rename the ports to something more sensible. *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Omer
10 days ago
I see your point, but I think swapping the cables at node-01 / la with cable at node-01 / Id might actually solve the redundancy issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
12 days ago
I think swapping the cables at node-01 / Id with cable at node-02 / Id would be the correct action to take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
13 days ago
Yeah, I agree. 'Id' and 'lb' are definitely strange port names. Renaming them would make things a lot clearer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margurite
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Swapping the cables at node-01/lb and node-02/lb seems like it might just switch the problem, not fix it. Maybe option C is the way to go?
upvoted 0 times
Joni
12 days ago
Let's go ahead and try swapping the cables at node-01 / la and node-01 / ld to see if that resolves the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
15 days ago
I agree, that could be a good solution to fix the redundancy issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 months ago
I think option C could work, swapping the cables at node-01 / la and node-01 / ld might help.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawnda
1 months ago
Looks like we need to swap the cables on the nodes to create a redundant connection. I'd go with option B - that seems like the logical choice based on the diagram.
upvoted 0 times
Lacey
11 days ago
User1: Let's go ahead and swap those cables to correct the redundancy issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
22 days ago
User2: Yeah, swapping the cables at node-01 / lb and node-02 / lb makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
29 days ago
User1: I agree, option B seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mauricio
2 months ago
But if you look at the output, it clearly shows that the issue is with node-01 / Id and node-02 / Id. So, my answer makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe swapping cable at node-01 / lb with cable at node-02 / lb is the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
2 months ago
I think the correct action is to swap cable at node-01 / Id with cable at node-02 / Id.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel