NCMA Exam CPCM Topic 5 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for NCMA's CPCM exam

Question #: 79
Topic #: 5

[All CPCM Questions]

In evaluating the opportunity, the score is calculated by multiplying the raw score, opportunity factor by:

Apre-established weight value

Bpost-established weight value

Cpre-established matrix value

Dpost-established margin value

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Jade at Dec 26, 2023, 03:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPCM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Coral

2 months ago

Why not just roll a dice and see what happens? That's how I evaluate all my opportunities.

upvoted 0 times

Temeka

19 days ago

C) pre-established matrix value

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

24 days ago

That's a more systematic approach than rolling a dice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristel

1 months ago

A) pre-established weight value

upvoted 0 times

...

Margot

2 months ago

I heard the correct answer is actually Option E: Multiply the raw score by the weight of your wallet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sena

2 months ago

Option D, all the way! Who needs weights when you can have margins?

upvoted 0 times

Ezekiel

11 days ago

I see your point, but I still think post-established weight values are more accurate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Myrtie

25 days ago

I prefer using pre-established weight values for calculating the score.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salena

1 months ago

I think using a post-established margin value makes the most sense in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leigha

1 months ago

I agree, margins are definitely important when evaluating opportunities.

upvoted 0 times

...

An

2 months ago

Option B is the way to go! Post-established weights are the way of the future, man.

upvoted 0 times

Dorethea

1 months ago

Post-established matrix values can really help in determining the overall score accurately.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ben

2 months ago

I think pre-established weight values can be too rigid, post-established gives more flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winfred

2 months ago

I agree, post-established weights make the evaluation process more accurate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melodie

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm leaning towards Option C. The matrix value seems like a more comprehensive approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristofer

3 months ago

Option A sounds like the way to go. Pre-established weights make the most sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

Lashawn

1 months ago

Pre-established weights provide consistency in evaluating opportunities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucy

2 months ago

Yes, it helps to have a set weight value to calculate the score accurately.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denise

2 months ago

I agree, using pre-established weight values is the most logical approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassie

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) pre-established matrix value, as matrices are often used in evaluating opportunities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thersa

3 months ago

I agree with Harris, because the opportunity score is usually calculated based on the weight assigned to each factor.

upvoted 0 times

...

Harris

3 months ago

I think the answer is A) pre-established weight value.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it makes sense to use the pre-established weight value to calculate the opportunity score.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oretha

3 months ago

I agree with Slyvia, because the opportunity score is usually calculated based on the pre-established weight value.

upvoted 0 times

...

Slyvia

3 months ago

I think the answer is A) pre-established weight value.

upvoted 0 times

...