What clause can provide for price increases based on the seller's costs but not on the seller's decision to increase the prices of its products and services?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CPCM Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
AN
Annabelle
10 months ago
I’m surprised this is a common term, never heard of it before!
DA
Danica
10 months ago
I agree with A, it’s all about cost changes, not seller whims.
TI
Timothy
10 months ago
Wait, is it really just A? Seems too straightforward.
DA
Dawne
10 months ago
A makes sense, but I thought B could fit too.
PA
Pansy
11 months ago
Definitely A, economic price adjustment is the right term.
JE
Jeannetta
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused between A and C. I think C might relate to taxes, but I’m not confident about that.
GA
Gabriele
11 months ago
I feel like I've seen a question similar to this before, and A was the correct choice then too. It just makes sense for cost-based adjustments.
LE
Lemuel
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about variable pricing being linked to market conditions. Could it be B?
SA
Sabrina
12 months ago
I think the answer might be A, the Economic price adjustment clause. It seems to fit the description of being based on costs rather than the seller's choice.
MA
Martin
12 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. The economic price adjustment clause seems like the best fit based on the description.
JU
Julio
12 months ago
Okay, I think I have a strategy for this. I'll focus on identifying the clause that allows for cost-based increases but not seller-driven price hikes.
GO
Golda
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to review the key concepts around price adjustments to figure out the right approach.
KE
Keneth
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between the options and what they each imply.
SI
Silva
1 year ago
D) Appropriate price adjustment? Sounds a bit too vague for my liking. I'm going with A) - keep it simple, keep it fair.
NA
Natalie
1 year ago
I think D) Appropriate price adjustment might leave too much room for interpretation.
VA
Valene
1 year ago
I agree, A) Economic price adjustment seems like the most straightforward option.
CL
Clorinda
1 year ago
I think C) Prices & Taxes adjustment could also be a possibility, as it includes both price and tax adjustments.
AN
Antonio
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) Appropriate price adjustment.
KA
Karol
1 year ago
C) Prices & Taxes adjustment? Really? That's like saying 'Hey, we can charge you whatever we want!' Nah, A) is the way to go.
DA
Daniel
1 year ago
Yeah, C) Prices & Taxes adjustment seems too vague and open to abuse.
CH
Cherri
1 year ago
I agree, A) is more fair and reasonable.
GL
Glenna
1 year ago
A) Economic price adjustment is the best option for that.
MA
Mari
1 year ago
I was thinking B) Variable-price adjustment, but A) makes more sense. Gotta love those cost-of-living clauses, am I right?
JO
Josue
1 year ago
Yeah, cost-of-living clauses can really impact price increases.
HE
Helga
1 year ago
I agree, A) Economic price adjustment seems like the best option.
JE
Jerilyn
1 year ago
I agree with Geoffrey, because it makes sense to base price increases on the seller's costs.
GE
Geoffrey
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Economic price adjustment.
MA
Martina
1 year ago
A) Economic price adjustment seems like the right choice. Allows for cost-based increases, not just arbitrary price hikes. Simple and straightforward.
AL
Alfreda
1 year ago
C) Prices & Taxes adjustment doesn't fit the criteria. We're looking for a clause that specifically addresses cost increases.
CO
Colton
1 year ago
B) Variable-price adjustment wouldn't be the best choice in this scenario. We need something based on costs, not variability.
RO
Rolf
1 year ago
A) Economic price adjustment is the correct answer. It's based on the seller's costs, not their decision to raise prices.