An architect has just received client approval of the Schematic Design documents for a three-story, outpatient medical clinic. The clinic is located within a mixed-use development governed by
a City-approved Planned Development (PD) document. The medical clinic design utilizes standardized departmental layouts and includes outpatient clinics, as well as treatment spaces,
administrative spaces and public/lobby spaces.
The site needs to accommodate four different vehicular traffic flows: patient traffic, staff traffic, service and delivery traffic, and emergency services traffic. In addition, a pedestrian plaza
must connect to the mixed-use development sidewalks. The plaza must provide space for bicycle parking and will serve as the future bus stop.
The site design addresses several challenges related to building orientation. The southeast facade, with excellent visibility from the highway, is the location of all service equipment. The
building entrance faces northwest, convenient to the parking but not visible from the highway.
The client believes future patient volumes will outgrow the clinic. The PD document allows for a planned Phase 2 development on the adjacent vacant site to the southwest. Phase 2 would
include a second building (2 story, 80,000 BGSF) and/or a parking deck.
Other considerations for the project include:
Protected tree requirements are defined in the PD document.
Easy pedestrian access must be provided from Sycamore Boulevard.
All required parking for the clinic must be accommodated on site.
Programmed area includes 109,450 Departmental Gross Square Feet (DGSF) / 130,184 Building Gross Square Feet (BGSF).
Exterior material percentages are dictated by the PD document and shall not exceed specific percentages for Primary and Secondary Finishes.
All service equipment needs to be screened; see PD document for restrictions.
Signage opportunities are important to the client.
Acoustical privacy is a concern of the healthcare system.
The following resources are available for your reference:
Drawings, including a perspective, plans, and exterior elevations
Building Program, including client's departmental program and detailed program for Treatment 01 (Infusion)
Exterior Material Cost Comparisons
Planned Development Document
IBC Excerpts, showing relevant code sections
ADA Excerpts, showing relevant sections from the ADA Standards for Accessible Design
Pink granite is specified as an exterior material for the outpatient medical clinic. The owner directs the architect to propose alternate, less expensive materials to be used in lieu of the pink granite.
Which of the following materials should be considered to reduce cost? Check the two that apply.
Alternatives to expensive natural stone like pink granite include materials that provide similar aesthetic and durability at a lower cost:
Architectural precast (A) concrete panels offer a durable, customizable, and less expensive alternative.
Brick (F) is also cost-effective, versatile, and widely accepted as an exterior finish.
Black granite (B) and slate (D) remain expensive natural stones.
Ashlar veneer (C) may still be costly.
Metal panels (E) are typically used as accent materials and may not be allowed extensively per PD requirements.
Planned Development Document
ARE 5.0 PPD -- Project Integration of Program and Systems
The Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice, 15th Edition -- Exterior Finishes
Paulina
9 hours agoDewitt
6 days agoRodrigo
11 days agoTamra
16 days agoCandra
21 days agoAzzie
26 days agoCeleste
1 month agoAlyce
1 month agoTeresita
1 month agoAnnamae
2 months agoMaile
2 months agoLuther
2 months agoBea
2 months agoChery
2 months agoFelice
3 months agoFannie
3 months agoBrittni
3 months agoWilda
2 months agoIrving
3 months ago