New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NCARB Project-Planning-Design Exam - Topic 2 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for NCARB's Project-Planning-Design exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 2
[All Project-Planning-Design Questions]

An architect is commissioned to design a lodge in a location where the water service is insufficient for a sprinkler system. The architect plans to maximize sight lines by using exposed columns and roof structure in the primary assembly space.

Which of the following systems meet these requirements? Check the three that apply.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, F

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

When designing in locations with insufficient water service to support sprinkler systems, architects must rely on inherently fire-resistant materials or assemblies that can provide passive fire protection while also meeting the aesthetic and structural needs of the space. This is especially critical in assembly spaces where sight lines are important and exposed structure is desired.

Option A: Steel columns with open web girders and joists are acceptable because steel does not combust and can be designed for fire resistance either by inherent fireproofing or applied fireproofing. The open-web design also supports maximizing sight lines by minimizing visual obstruction.

Option B: Large peeled log columns with glulam beams and wood decking are commonly used in lodge designs. Although wood is combustible, large timber members like glulam beams char on the surface and maintain structural capacity for a predictable duration under fire conditions, which often meets code for exposed timber in assembly spaces without sprinkler systems.

Option F: Cedar columns with light gauge steel purlins and fire retardant treated plywood decking can be suitable where fire retardant treatment extends the fire resistance of wood members. This is an accepted strategy in areas lacking sprinkler protection, particularly for visual warmth and compatibility with lodge aesthetics.

Options C and D: Concrete columns and beams are noncombustible but tend to be bulky and can obstruct sight lines. Additionally, precast planks with concrete may not fit the desired exposed wood or open aesthetic.

Option E: Light gauge steel columns with corrugated metal decking are lightweight and minimal, but 3' steel columns are structurally insufficient for large assembly spaces and metal decking without proper fireproofing is less common in exposed wood aesthetic projects.

These design choices align with NCARB's Project Planning & Design content regarding material selection for fire resistance, visual requirements, and assembly occupancy considerations. Specifically, the guidelines recommend using heavy timber, fire-retardant-treated wood, or protected steel systems where sprinkler systems are not feasible to comply with fire and life safety codes while addressing architectural intent.


ARE 5.0 PPD Content Outline: Building Systems, Materials, and Assemblies (NCARB)

The Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice, 15th Edition, Chapter 13: Building Codes, Standards, and Regulations

NCARB ARE 5.0 Guidelines: Fire Protection and Material Performance in Assembly Spaces

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Elouise
3 days ago
F) 6 x 6 cedar columns with 6" light gauge "z" purlins and fire retardant treated plywood decking - now that's rustic!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
8 days ago
E) 3" light gauge steel columns with 6" "z" purlins and 28 gauge corrugated metal decking seems a bit sketchy for a lodge. I'd want something more sturdy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudia
13 days ago
B) 12" diameter peeled log columns with glulam beams and 4" wood decking looks like the best option for maximizing sight lines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
18 days ago
I’m a bit confused about the light gauge steel options. E seems too light for a lodge, but F might be okay if it’s treated properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
23 days ago
I practiced a similar question last week, and I think C is a solid choice because concrete is strong and durable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
29 days ago
I'm not entirely sure about the materials, but I feel like B could work since it's more natural and blends with the lodge concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
1 month ago
I remember we discussed the importance of structural integrity in areas with limited water service. I think A and D might be good options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestine
1 month ago
Alright, time to put on my architect's hat. I feel confident I can identify the three best options that meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
1 month ago
This is a good opportunity to apply my knowledge of building systems. I think I've got a solid strategy to work through this step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different materials and sizes listed. I'll need to make sure I understand the pros and cons of each before selecting the right ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
2 months ago
Okay, let's see. The exposed columns and roof structure are key, so I'll focus on those options first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
2 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around the water service and the exposed structure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel