New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NCARB Project-Planning-Design Exam - Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for NCARB's Project-Planning-Design exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All Project-Planning-Design Questions]

An architect has just received client approval of the Schematic Design documents for a three-story, outpatient medical clinic. The clinic is located within a mixed-use development governed by

a City-approved Planned Development (PD) document. The medical clinic design utilizes standardized departmental layouts and includes outpatient clinics, as well as treatment spaces,

administrative spaces and public/lobby spaces.

The site needs to accommodate four different vehicular traffic flows: patient traffic, staff traffic, service and delivery traffic, and emergency services traffic. In addition, a pedestrian plaza

must connect to the mixed-use development sidewalks. The plaza must provide space for bicycle parking and will serve as the future bus stop.

The site design addresses several challenges related to building orientation. The southeast facade, with excellent visibility from the highway, is the location of all service equipment. The

building entrance faces northwest, convenient to the parking but not visible from the highway.

The client believes future patient volumes will outgrow the clinic. The PD document allows for a planned Phase 2 development on the adjacent vacant site to the southwest. Phase 2 would

include a second building (2 story, 80,000 BGSF) and/or a parking deck.

Other considerations for the project include:

Protected tree requirements are defined in the PD document.

Easy pedestrian access must be provided from Sycamore Boulevard.

All required parking for the clinic must be accommodated on site.

Programmed area includes 109,450 Departmental Gross Square Feet (DGSF) / 130,184 Building Gross Square Feet (BGSF).

Exterior material percentages are dictated by the PD document and shall not exceed specific percentages for Primary and Secondary Finishes.

All service equipment needs to be screened; see PD document for restrictions.

Signage opportunities are important to the client.

Acoustical privacy is a concern of the healthcare system.

The following resources are available for your reference:

Drawings, including a perspective, plans, and exterior elevations

Building Program, including client's departmental program and detailed program for Treatment 01 (Infusion)

Exterior Material Cost Comparisons

Planned Development Document

IBC Excerpts, showing relevant code sections

ADA Excerpts, showing relevant sections from the ADA Standards for Accessible Design

The developer decides that the 4-inch terra cotta exterior veneer is too expensive, and wants to replace the terra cotta with an alternative finish in its entirety.

Which of the following alternative materials should the architect suggest to reduce cost and meet the Planned Development Document requirements? Check the two that apply.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, E

To reduce costs while complying with Planned Development (PD) document restrictions on exterior finishes, the architect should select materials that are less expensive than terra cotta yet meet aesthetic and code requirements:

Standard brick (C) is a cost-effective, durable alternative with broad acceptance.

Earth tone EIFS (E) (Exterior Insulation and Finish System) offers an economical and versatile finish that can replicate various textures and colors while reducing costs.

Low priced stone (A) and cultured stone (B) may still be costly or not permitted per PD document.

Artisan brick (D) and metal panels (F) may exceed allowed percentages or not fit aesthetic guidelines.


Planned Development Document

ARE 5.0 PPD -- Project Integration of Program and Systems

The Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice, 15th Edition -- Exterior Finishes

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Sommer
2 months ago
Low Priced Stone might not hold up over time, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
2 months ago
Wait, can they really just swap the terra cotta like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
2 months ago
I think Cultured Stone would look great too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
3 months ago
Totally agree, metal panels could work well here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
3 months ago
Standard Brick seems like a solid choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
3 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the metal panels; I know they can be sleek but not sure if they fit the PD's material restrictions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question about exterior finishes, and I feel like standard brick could be a safe choice since it’s commonly accepted and cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
4 months ago
I think cultured stone might be a good option since it can mimic natural stone and is often lighter, but I’m not certain if it meets all the aesthetic guidelines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
4 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of matching materials to the PD document requirements, but I'm not sure which finishes would qualify as acceptable alternatives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
4 months ago
This is a great opportunity to demonstrate my problem-solving skills. I'll carefully analyze the material cost comparisons and the PD document to identify the two most suitable alternatives that meet the cost and design criteria. I'm feeling confident I can nail this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
4 months ago
I'm a little confused by all the different site and program requirements here. I'll need to make sure I fully understand the constraints before deciding on the best material option. Maybe I'll start by reviewing the drawings and the PD document to get a clearer picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
4 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Based on the PD document restrictions and the need to reduce costs, I'd suggest either the Standard Brick or the Cultured Stone as good alternatives to the terra cotta. Both should meet the aesthetic requirements while being more budget-friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
4 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not too familiar with the PD document requirements, so I'll need to spend some time reviewing that closely. The key will be finding a material that's cost-effective but still aligns with the design guidelines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty complex question with a lot of details to consider. I'll need to carefully review the program requirements, site constraints, and PD document to identify the best alternative materials that meet the cost and aesthetic criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel